Save
...
Approaches
The Learning Approaches
Skinner’s Operant Conditioning
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
eloise allen
Visit profile
Cards (7)
Skinner
Some behaviours too
complex
for CC
Sometimes our
actions
associated with
consequences
Reinforcement
=
increased
likelihood of behaviour
Positive
reinforcement ->
reward
of something
pleasant
given
for behaviour = behaviour more likely to be
repeated
Negative reinforcement =
reward
of something
unpleasant
removed
for behaviour = behaviour more likely to be repeated
Punishment =
reduced
likelihood/
extinction
of behaviour
Positive
punishment = punishment given by
introduction
of something
negative
to
prevent
behaviour
Negative
punishment = punishment given by
removal
of something
pleasant
to
prevent
behaviour
Behaviour made
less
likely through association with
unpleasant
consequence
OC key research: Skinner’s experiments on rats
Skinner
box
C1:
positive
reinforcement
C2:
negative
reinforcement
C3: positive
punishment
OC A&E point 1: weight of evidence + explanatory power to support theory
Skinner’s findings showed rats could learn to push/avoid lever to either gain food or avoid being shocked/a loud noise
Show actions become associated with rewarding consequences = encourages
repetition
of behaviour
This is what theory predicts will occur
OC A&E point 2: Skinner’s research has problem of extrapolation
Subjects = rats + pigeons = significant physiological differences between them + humans
OC’s principles may not apply to humans (more advanced cognitive abilities + higher order-thinking)
Bandura + Walter’s 1963 findings = cognitive processes play a part in the way people act -> may not be the same with animals
Theory is overly
reductionist
OC A&E point 3: real-life
application
to support theory
Zoe Kravitz in YSL Black Opium ad