A process of natural selection and the key factor underpinning human reproductive behaviour
Sexual selection
1. Individuals with traits that increase reproductive success gain an evolutionary advantage
2. Individuals without these traits are outcompeted and unable to mate, so their genes disappear from the gene pool
Ways sexual selection operates
Intrasexual selection (same-sex contest)
Intersexual selection (one sex competes for the attention of the opposite sex)
Intrasexual selection
Individuals outcompete members of the same sex in order to gain access to mates
Usually a male strategy which can involve aggression
Preference for many mates (quantity rather than quality), i.e. polygamy
Characteristics such as greater strength and cunning get passed on to future generations
Intersexual selection
Individuals evolve preferences for desirable qualities in the opposite sex
Usually a female strategy which can involve choosiness
Preference for single mate (quality rather than quantity), i.e. monogamy
Characteristics such as having access to resources and attractiveness will get passed on to future generations
Anisogamy
Differences between male and female gametes (sex cells), which result in different strategies for reproductive success
Anisogamy
Leads to a reproductive strategy of males seeking mates who are fertile and have high reproductive value, and females choosing mates who can provide economic resources and support
Research supporting sexual selection
Clark & Hatfield (1989) found 75% of men agreed immediately to a request for sex, but none of the women did
Research supporting anisogamy leading to differences in partner preference
Buss (1989) found females valued resource related characteristics more than males, while males valued reproductive capacity more
Gender differences in partner preferences are not only due to sexual selection pressures (nature) but also stem from socialisation and culture (nurture)
Human reproductive behaviour is a complex mixture of sexually selective pressures and cultural influences
Evidence suggests mate preference varies across the menstrual cycle, indicating inter-sexual selection is more complex than originally believed
Physical attractiveness
Indicates a person's level of genetic fitness and fertility, therefore it is linked to good evolutionary choice of a mating partner
Men are more likely than women to report appearance as important in attraction in long-term relationships, but both men and woman consider appearance important for a short-term partner
Halo effect
A cognitive bias which causes people to assume an attractive person has positive traits
Matching hypothesis
We are attracted to those individuals who closely match our perceptions of our own level of physical attractiveness
The matching hypothesis is undermined as an explanation for attraction in romantic relationships because of mixed research evidence
Complex matching
People can attract partners far more physically attractive than themselves by offering compensatory assets like status and money
Physical attractiveness is more important in initial attraction and lessens as the relationship progresses
Some cultures and sub-cultures practice arranged marriage, where factors other than physical attractiveness can drive the choice of potential partner
Self-disclosure
The extent to which a person reveals and shares personal information, such as their intimate thoughts, feelings and experiences about themselves to another person
Reciprocity in self-disclosure
For a relationship to develop there needs to be a reciprocal (two way) element to disclosure
Breadth and depth of self-disclosure
As both increase, romantic partners become more committed to each other
Research support for the importance of self-disclosure
Sprecher et al., Collins & Miller, Sprecher & Hendrick
Research into self-disclosure can help people who want to improve communication in their relationships
Cultures differ in their patterns of self-disclosure, so the assumption that increasing depth and breadth will always lead to a more satisfying relationship may not be universal
Self-disclosure
Deliberately and skilfully used by romantic partners to increase intimacy and strengthen their bond
57% of gay men and women said that open and honest disclosure was the main way they maintained and deepened their committed relationships
Less-skilled partners
Those who tend to limit communication to 'small-talk'
If less-skilled partners can learn to use self-disclosure then this could bring several benefits to the relationship in terms of deepening satisfaction and commitment
The universal assumption that increasing depth and breadth of self-disclosure will always lead to a more satisfying and intimate relationship is an issue with research on self-disclosure
Cultures differ in the extent to which various topics are considered appropriate for conversation
In the West, people typically engage in more intimate self-disclosure than non-Westerners
Men and women in the USA (individualistic) self-disclose significantly more sexual thoughts and feelings than men and women in China (collectivist)
Self-disclosure may be less appropriate in cultures that practice arranged marriages
In arranged marriages, partners have less free choice about who to marry, and therefore the level of self-disclosure between partners may not influence relationship satisfaction
The importance of self-disclosure as an aspect of attraction is heavily moderated by the influence of culture
Internet relationship formation involve higher levels of self-disclosure than in face-to-face relationships often due to anonymity
'Boom and bust' phenomenon
When people reveal more about themselves earlier than they would in a face-to-face interaction, relationships get intense very quickly (boom) but become difficult to sustain (bust)