How does Social Support help to resist Conformity?
Can be reduced when other people notconforming is present
Asch study -> person not conforming doesn't have to give right answer but just to have someone else there who doesn'tfollow majority --> acts as a 'model'
THIS enables p. to be free & follow ownconscious
How does Social Support help resist Obedience?
pressure to obey reduced if someone else is seen to disobey
MILGRAM Variation - obedience fell 65% -> 10% when a disobeying confederate joined
participant might not follow disobedient behaviour but sees them as a 'model' & able to act on own conscious
What is Locus of Control?
A concept - the extent which people believe they have control over their ownlives
Who came up with the idea of LoC?
Julian Rotter
Give an example of having Internal LoC.
If we did good on an exam - the belief that we did well is because we revised hard for it
Give an example of External LoC.
If did well on exam - the belief we did well is because the textbook we used was good/blame it on luck
Which is more likely to resist S.I? Internal or External?
Internal
Why is Internal LoC more likely to resist?
-> Takes responsibility for their actions and act on their own value
Self confident
Less need for social approval
Why is External LoC more likely to conform/obey?
-> believe what happens to them is due to external factors - have no control over
What is LoC of? (scale)
Continuum
If ELoC - outcome out of our control - everything is determined by fate
If ILoC - outcome is within our control - determined by how hard we work
In between - low ELoC/ILoC
STRENGTH (SS)- REAL WORLD APP
-> Albrecht - 8 week program that provided help to pregnant teens - resist pressure to smoke
--> Social Support - by someone older - significantly less to smoke than control group
Can also prevent doing other dangerous/damaging behaviour during preg -> will reducebaby having health problems
Financially beneficial - focus on other resources than medical issues as its prevented in advance
STRENGTH (SS) - Research Support
->Gamson et al - had people work in groups to gather evidence to help an oil company run a smear campaign
--> Had higher levels of resistance than in Milgram study - due to being in groups?
88% rebelled - peer support links to greater resistance - obedience
STRENGTH (LoC) - Research support
-> HOLLAND - RepeatedMilgram's study - measured participants if they had Internal or External
--> 37% internals did not continue to the highest level of shock
--> 23% externals did not continue to highest level
Internals show greaterresistance to authority -> ignored the prompts
Increases validity on LOC
LIMITATION (LOC) Limited Explanation
-> Rotter - LOC only could be used in novel situations than familiar situations
--> if situation is done in the past - most likely will repeat the behaviour from back then
LOC can only work in novel situation - new decision