Bacchi's method (2009) for discourse analysis
1. What is the "problem" represented to be?
2. What presuppositions or assumptions underlie this representation of the "problem?"
3. How has the representation of the "problem" come about?
4. What is left unproblematic in the "problem" representation?
5. What effects are produced by this representation of the "problem?"
6. How/where has this representation of the "problem" been produced, disseminated and defended? How could it be questioned, disrupted and replaced?