Arrest/question suspects, and charge if enough evidence
CPS:
Set up by Prosecution of Offences Act 1985
Began operating in 1986
Prosecute offenders on behalf of the state if: theres enough evidence and in public interest (code)
CPS Role:
Deciding what offences should be charged in all major cases
Review evidence to assess chances of successful prosecution
Give guidance on the admissability of evidence to police
Prosecute cases (Magistrates and Crown Court)
CPS Composition:
Director of the Public Prosecution
^
|
ChiefCrown Prosecutor (in 13 main geographical areas)
^
|
BranchCrown Prosecutor (located in a branch of each area)
^
|
Lawyers and support staff (located at each branch)
CPS Code: Full Code Test s10 Prosecution of Offences Act 1985
Decision of whether to charge offences is based upon two tests:
Evidential Test (enough evidence)
Public Interest Test
CPS Criticisms:
Narrey Report 1997: criticised tense relationships between CPS and Police, and delay in cases going from police to court. Now, there are lawyers in police stations and CPS Direct.
Types of Offences:
Indictable = most serious offence (murder, manslaughter)
Triable Either Way Offence = Can be trialled in either Magistrates or Crown Court (ABH, speeding, drunk driving)
Summary = least serious offence (theft, assault)
Pre-Trial Processes: Indictable Offences:
EAH (Early administrative hearing) takes place
Case transferred to Crown Court
Other pre-trial matters dealt with in Plea and Case Management Hearing. Council deals with housekeeping issues.
Pre-Trial Processes: Triable Either Way offences:
Plea before Venuehearing where defendant is asked to enter their plea
If defendant pleads guilty, they will be sentenced immediately at the Magistrates
Id defendant pleads not guilty, Magistrates will proceed to Mode of trial hearing/allocation hearing where they will decide whether to accept jurisdiction
If jurisdiction is accepted, defendant chooses where they want their trial to take place (= defendant election)
Pre-Trial Processes: Summary Offences
EAH occurs to discover if defendant wants legal aid, requests pre-trial sentence reports or medical reports, which is dealt with by a single lay magistrate of the court clerk.
Pre Trial Matter: Bail
Decided before trial whether the defendant should be remanded on bail (free to go until trial) or remanded in custody (remain in jail/prison until trial)
Police Bail: s38 The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
Arrest
If not charged, they return to police station
If charged, EAH occurs and pre-trial process begins
Police can refuse bail if:
Name and address isn't found/false
It's for the suspect's/someone else's protection
Felt that the suspect won't return
Felt that the suspect will interfere with witnesses
Suspect charged with murder
(If police refuse bail after charging defendant, defendant must go to Magistrates Court for case to be heard. If cannot be heard, Magistrates will decide as to bail)
Court Bail:
(Police Bail Process)
Trial
Refusal of Bail AFTER DECISION IS MADE: Bail Act 1976
Felt that accused won't return
Felt that accused will commit further offences on bail
Felt that accused might interfere with witnesses or destroy evidence
Defendant's own interest that bail is refused
5 Factors to consider when deciding to grant bail BEFORE DECISION IS MADE
Nature/seriousness of the offence
Character and previous record of defendant
Family and community tied of the defendant
Behaviour of defendant when on bail previously
Strength of prosecution evidence
Conditional Bail:
Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 = 'bail can be subject to conditions being imposed'
On bail with tag
Surrender passport/documents
Surrender at police stationweekly/monthly
Failure to comply = defendant will be remanded in custody
Sureties:
Where someone prepares to pay the court a sum of money if the accused fails to return after having been granted bail
Bail ammendment act 1993 gives prosecution rights to appeal against granting bail
The Trial: (stage 1-5)
Jurysworn in to try the case
Prosecution makes an openingspeech to jury
Prosecution: 'examination in chief' and 'crossexamination' occurs
Section9statements reads to the court (statements of witnesses that each side agree on and are not disputed)
Weak case = prosecutioncloses the case ('no case to answer') If judge agrees, they will direct the jury to acquit
The Trial (stage 6-9)
6. Defenceopeningspeech if they feel there is a case
7. Defence call their own witnesses and conduct 'examination in chief' whilst prosecution'crossexamine' them
8. Each side perform closingspeech (D last)
9. Judge sums mainpoints/laws to jury and courtusher leads them to deliberate the verdict
Appeals by the Defendant: Magistrate Court Appeals: 1. Case Stated Appeals (for P and D)
Made to the KBD
If the Magistrates decision was wrong in law or they exceeded their jurisdiction by making a law outside their powers
Mags 'state the case' in writing and the court makes its decision based on those documents
Court can either confirm or alter the magistrates decision for D, or court will direct the mags to convict the D and pass a conviction for P
Appeals by the Defendant: Magistrate Court Appeals: 2. Appeals against conviction/sentence
Made to the Crown Court
If D pleads not guilty before Mags, there's a right to appeal against conviction, sentence or both
If D pleads guilty, appeals route will be sentence only
Takes the form of tr-hearing
Court can either vary the original decision or confirm it, and also have the power to increase the sentence given by Mags (no more than 6 months)
Appeals from Defendant: Appeals from Crown Court:
D appealing against conviction and/or sentence
A request from D must be made orally at the court or in writing within 14 days
Notice of Appeal must be filed at Court of Appeal within 28 days of D being convicted
When leave is granted, Court of Appeal can: allow the appeal and quash the conviction, decrease sentence given, dismiss the appeal, vary the conviction, order re-trial in front of new jury
Referral by Prosecution: Referral on a point of law
To the Attorney General for clarification following an acquittal
Referral by Prosecution: Against an unduly lenient sentence
Referred to Attorney General who can order that the case be referred to the Court of Appeal who has the power to increase the sentence
Referral by Prosecution: Against jury nobbling
Prosecution may appeal an acquittal where a person has been convicted of intimidating one of the jurors in attempt to secrete the acquittal
Referral by Prosecution: Against a judge erroneous decision (made in error)
Prosecution may appeal a judicial ruling which terminated the Prosecution's case
Abolition of the double jeopardy rule:
'Once acquitted, defendant could not be trialled again for the same/similar offence'
In 2003, the Criminal Justice Act abolished this, allowing a retrial to take place if:
there is new and compelling evidence
In the public interest
R V Dunlop - Dunlop strangled a pizza delivery girl. Jury failed to reach verdict twice but third time convicted due to new and compelling evidence
CCRC = Criminal Case Review Commission
Miscarriage of Justice = Unless appeals are made in time, wrongly convicted defendants may serve years in prison or an unsafe conviction
Old Law - The home secretary had the power to request that the Court of Appeal re-examine such a miscarriage of justice under s17 Criminal Appeal Act
1992 - The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice recommended that an independent body be established to deal with the miscarriage of justice because the power under the old law was rarely exercised.
CCRC began in 1997 created by Criminal Appeal Act 1995
Role of CCRC:
To review and investigate cases of suspended wrongful convictions and/or sentences
To refer cases to the appropriate court whenever it feels that there is a real possibility that the conviction/verdict/finding will not be possible
Investigations may be referred to the CCRC by defendants themselves or their families. To establish a possibility of an appeal, there must be a new argument/evidence that hasn't been raised at trial or exceptional circumstances
Report back to Court of Appeal to help the court resolve its appeal
Composition of the CCRC:
Based in Birmingham, 100 staff including core of 50 caseworkers supported by administrative staff (9 commissioners, all members appointed by monarch, at least 1/3 members legally qualified, 2/3 have relevant experience in criminal justice system
Advantages of CCRC:Advantages:
Accessible to the defendant, their family and court
Gives defendant extra opportunity to challeng criminal justice system
Investigated 310 quashed convictions
Disadvantages of CCRC:
Doesn't have the power to overturn an appeal/quash conviction