Identity as a product of being socialised into value consensus
Marxist view of identity
Identity as the product of being socialised into our class position, e.g. whether you are a member of the bourgeoisie
Feminist view of identity
Identity as the product of socialisation into our gender roles
Interactionist view of identity
Socialisation as a two-way process
Individuals are not simply passive consumers of culture, norms and values, but rather they actively create identity through interactions
Focus on small scale social interactions and how they influence who we are
More emphasis on the role of the individual in creating identity
Interactionists-Norms, values and roles are not roles but guidelines that individuals can interpret
A drawback to the interactionist theory could be that it ignores class and anomie
Identity
Our sense of self, can be influenced by gender, social class, etc.
Looking-glass self
The concept explained by Cooley - the idea that our image of ourselves are reflected back at us from the views of others
As we consider the image of ourselves reflected in the reactions of others we may modify and change our behaviour
Our selfconcept or individual identity is therefore a socialconstruct
Presentation of self
Sometimes we take initiative rather than waiting for others to form an opinion of us. Goffman called this the presentation of self in everyday life.
impressionmanagement-Goffman- the way individuals try to convinceothers of the identity they wish to assert by giving particularimpressions of themselves
Impression management
The way individuals try to convince others of the identity they wish to assert by giving particular impressions of themselves
According to interactionists, our identity is formed through a combination of understandings of how we see ourselves and how others react to us
Labelling theory
An interactionist theory developed by Becker
The labelling theory argues that in society we tend to apply labels to individuals describing how we expect them to behave
Labelling theories study how and why some people committing an act are seen as deviant, while other people committing the same act are not
Becker's argument is that once an individual has been labelled and has certain behaviour expected of them they tend to live up to that label, acting the expectedway
The label can become that individual's master status dominating any other statuses they may have
Becker focuses on how individuals can be labelled in a negative way by the police, but other agents of social control such as teachers can label students in negative ways and this can impact their self-concept
Labels can be negotiated and it might be easier for some people to shake off a negative label
Individuals are seen as having too much control over their identity in interactionism. Not enough emphasis on power inequalities in society and stigmas.
While the individual may try to present a certain impression to others, there is no certainty that their impression management will always succeed. This is particularly true for those with stigmatized identities.
When we meet a stranger, we may notice that they possess an attribute that makes them different, e.g. disabilities. People may define them in terms of their stigmatized attributes, which may be seen as less desirable, even seen as bad/dangerous.
Goffman analysed the difficulties that some groups face in constructing a positive social identity.