Offender Profiling

    Cards (67)

    • Offender profiling
      An investigation tool employed by the police when solving crimes, with the aim of creating an idea of the offender's likely characteristics
    • Purpose of offender profiling
      • Helps the police focus their resources on more likely suspects
      • Can create new leads within an investigation
    • Top down approach to profiling
      Also known as the typology approach, where evidence from the crime scene and other details are used to fit into either of the pre-existing categories of organised or disorganised offender
    • Organised offenders
      • The crime tends to be planned
      • The victim is specifically targeted
      • The killer often has a type
      • They maintain a high degree of control during the crime and may operate with almost detached surgical precision
      • They leave little evidence or clues behind at the crime scene
      • They are generally high in intelligence, socially and sexually competent, they usually live with a partner, have a car in good working order and follow their crimes in the media
    • Disorganised offenders
      • The crime tends to be unplanned
      • Random selection of victim suggesting the offence may have been spontaneous or spur of the moment
      • Very little control during the crime and often impulsive so the body/evidence is usually left at the crime scene
      • Tend to have a lower than average IQ and be in unskilled work or unemployed and often have a history with sexual dysfunction and failed relationships and they tend to live alone
    • The Top Down approach originated in the United States, as a result of work carried out by the FBI in the 1970's
    • Construction of the top down profile
      1. Data assimilation
      2. Crime scene classification
      3. Crime reconstruction
      4. Profile generation
    • Data assimilation
      Investigators gather together information from multiple sources including crime scene description, victim background, and crime details
    • Crime scene classification
      Profilers decide whether the crime scene represents an organised or disorganised offender
    • Crime reconstruction
      Reconstructing the crime in order to develop predictions about the motives and behaviour of the offender/victim
    • Profile generation

      A profile is then constructed of the offender which includes hypotheses about the offender's characteristics including likely background, personality, habits and physical appearance
    • Purpose of profile generation
      To help work out a strategy for the investigation to help catch the offender
    • Top-down approach
      A strength is that police who have used the FBI methods believe that it is useful
    • Top-down approach
      • It has been invaluable in order to help direct police resources in the right area
      • It can give a better understanding of the characteristics of the offender so to eliminate certain people from enquiries
    • Top-down profiling can only be used for a limited range of crimes such as murders, rapes or arsons
    • More common offences such as burglary and destruction of property do not lend themselves to profiling because the resulting crime scene reveals very little about the offender
    • Top-down profiling is a limited approach to identifying a criminal of only certain crimes
    • A problem with research into offender profiling is that researchers only focus on one variable that could be the cause an offender committing a crime
    • Typologies used to categorise offenders
      • Organised
      • Disorganised
    • Some offenders could show characteristics of both typologies therefore making the prediction of their characteristics difficult
    • Typologies used to categorise offenders
      • Organised
      • Disorganised
    • Canter et al., (2004) conducted content analysis on 100 cases of serial killers in the US
    • They used the criteria set out by Douglas to classify the crimes as organised or disorganised
    • Analysis of the types of crime did not clearly separate the organised and disorganised crimes and found no distinction between some crimes such as serial murders
    • Canter concluded that the criteria for identifying disorganised and organised crimes are too simplistic
    • Canter suggested that other factors such as individual personality differences between offenders (such as those used by investigative psychology) needs to be considered
    • The basis of the method is flawed
    • A further criticism of the top-down approach is the problem of generalising the results to offenders of different crimes, locations, races, or genders
    • The original data on which the organised/disorganised classification is based on interviews with 36 of the most dangerous and sexually motivated murderers (including Ted Bundy and Charles Manson)
    • The data was used to identify the key characteristics that would help people 'read' a crime scene
    • Such individuals (who are highly manipulative) are not the best source of reliable information
    • Their approach and rationale may be quite different to more 'typical' offenders
    • This sample does not represent all offenders and is a limitation of the top down approach
    • A criticism of the top-down approach to offender profiling is that the process is not based in any science or theory
    • The accuracy of the profiles generated might be very subjective and open to interpretation
    • Barnum Effect
      Vague evidence of the crime could be manipulated to fit into the characteristics of a particular type of offender (organised or disorganised) as part of the crime classification stage
    • Profiling has the potential to cause harm because if the profiles are wrong, this may mislead investigations
    • Bottom up approach
      More scientific as it is based on objective statistical techniques and computer analysis
    • Top-down approach to offender profiling
      Not based in science or theory
    • Bottom-up approach to offender profiling
      More scientific
    See similar decks