ensuring that people agree to take part in the research, not valid if they aren’t informed of what they’re agreeing to
informed consent
if deception is involved, we are unable to get informed consent to avoid demand characteristics
right to withdraw
participants should be able to withdraw from the study at any stage with no consequences, this includes the withdrawal of data collected, this right must be made clear
protection from harm
participants should be protected from any psychological and physical harm and their dignity should be protected also
confidentiality
this is the right of privacy, where personal data is kept securely by the researcher and research doesn’t include the identity of participants
debriefing
reveal any information withheld and checks for any psychological and physical harm
dealing w informed consent
revealing the true aims will lead to demand characteristics which reduces the internal validity
to avoid demand characteristics with informed consent
we can use alternatives to gaining consent:
prior general consent
retrospective consent
presumptive consent
prior general consent
ppts agree to long list of potential features of the study, not knowing what aspects of the study they will be apart of, will agree to number of studies, including ones involving deception
retrospective consent
asked for consent after taking part in the study, if they disagree, data is destroyed
presumptive consent
researcher asks group similar to sample if the study is acceptable, if this group agrees, it is assumed that the sample will also consent
dealing w deception
perform cost-benefit analysis
debriefing
cost-benefit analysis
assessing potential harm to participants and compare to benefits of research to society
ethics committee
decide whether research is carried out and use cost benefit analysis
however, the true value of a study isn’t known until years later, meaning it is difficult to conduct a cost benefit analysis
debriefing
explains the aims of the study and the existence of other groups, the debriefing also checks that no harm was caused, the right to withdraw is reminded and confidentiality is ensured
dealing w confidentiality
simply record no personal details, maintaining anonymity, in case studies researchers often refer to the individual by their initials (e.g case of HM)