This is an advanced social psychology course that integrates personality and social psychology
Personality psychology
To predict a person's behaviour, you need to understand what they're like as a person (e.g. personality traits, social identities)
Social psychology
To predict a person's behaviour, you need to understand the situation they're in (social situations predict behaviour regardless of a person's personality)
The person-situation debate is about whether the person or the situation is more influential in determining behaviour
The situation argument is that the average correlation between a person characteristic and specific behaviour is only 0.3, meaning only about 15% of behaviour can be predicted by characteristics of a person, and consistency in behaviour across situations is low
The person argument is that personality intuitively exists, is pretty stable across time, and predicts behaviour in general pretty well, even if not as accurate for behaviour at any one given time
Interactionist consensus
Behaviour is an interaction between characteristics of the person and the situation they're in - people influence the situation and the situation influences the person
This course focuses on the self
Self
Your social identity and your inner processes that enable you to operate your body successfully in society
The self is not a thing, but a system/process - the body is in flux and always adapting, selves are always in flux dealing with new situations, learning, and adapting
Self-concept
A cognitive representation of the knowledge and beliefs we have about ourselves, including our personality traits, abilities, social roles, values, goals and desires, and physical characteristics
The self-concept is important because it shapes how we think about the world, feel, and behave
Self-concept as an associative network
Knowledge is organized as a metaphorical network of cognitive concepts interconnected by links, where some concepts are more central and links between concepts vary in strength
People have lots of ideas about themselves, sometimes in contradiction with each other, so the self-concept is not a unitary, fixed, and integrated idea
Working self-concept
The subset of self-knowledge that is the current focus of awareness, created moment-to-moment
Situational activation
Different situations can activate different pieces of self-knowledge, thus creating different working self-concepts
Spreading activation
When a specific self-aspect is activated, other self-aspects that are linked with it are also activated, with strongly linked self-aspects being activated more quickly
The contents of the working self-concept are determined by: 1) distinctiveness to the situation, 2) relevance to the situation/activity, and 3) frequency of activation
The working self-concept is malleable and highly dependent on the context, allowing for contradictory self-aspects to simultaneously exist
The working self-concept influences how we behave, explaining why we behave differently in different situations
Studies show that experimentally manipulating the working self-concept can influence behaviour, demonstrating priming effects
Several elements are common to theories about the true self: 1) natural endowment, 2) feeling authentic, 3) people naturally wanting to be true to themselves, and 4) competing with external influences
Studies show that people believe following one's true self is an important strategy for making satisfying decisions, and difficulties accessing the true self are related to less decision satisfaction
There are several conceptual problems with the idea of a true self, including the lack of provability of a natural endowment, the inaccuracy of self-beliefs, and the tendency for the true self to be equated with what is socially desirable
Desired reputation
What is valued by society (ideals) + what distinctive role one's own abilities and traits are best suited to (actual self) - the most important "non-false self-concept" as it determines how one will be treated by others
People will feel most authentic when their actions are consistent with their desired reputation, which is an ongoing project that may vary slightly across different audiences
Self-complexity refers to the number of self-aspects (attributes, roles, relationships, goals, etc.) and the degree to which these self-aspects are distinct from each other
The self-concept is organized as an associative network of various self-aspects and is highly malleable
Working self-concept
A small subset of our self-concept that is accessible at any given moment
Working self-concept
Made up of situationally activated self-knowledge + frequently activated self-knowledge
The idea of a true self resonates with people, but ultimately has several conceptual issues that makes it unworkable
Desired reputation
The most important non-false self-concept. People will feel most authentic when behaving in line with it.
Self-complexity
People's self-concepts differ in the number of self-aspects (attributes, roles, relationships, goals, etc.) and the degree to which these self-aspects are distinct from each other
High self-complexity
Many self-aspects that are relatively distinct from each other
Low self-complexity
Few self-aspects that have a high degree of overlap with each other
Low self-complexity
Greater affective spillover, more extreme emotional reactions and changes in self-esteem
High self-complexity
Less affective spillover, more emotional stability, and may serve as a buffer against stress
Review of 24 studies examining buffering effects of self-complexity showed mixed results
Self-concept clarity (SCC)
The extent to which the contents of the self-concept are clearly defined, consistent with each other, and stable