The capability of the investigator to interact both in written and oral. This means that they can do effective interview either to the witness or suspect as well as be able to write a written report when required to do so.
Effective interview
A fruitful interaction between the investigator and the people as he gathers information without language problem.
Active listener
The ability of the investigator to attentively hear the testimony given by a witness and be able to identify hearsay statements or false statements.
Hearsay
Statements made by the person who does not witness the actual commission of the crime.
False statements
Those statements which are purely fictitious and are invented only by the witness.
Critical thinking
Analytical skills of the investigator while he formulates judgment based on the testimonies given by witnesses and evidences gathered in the course of investigation.
Work under pressure
The capacity of the investigator to go through the investigation process despite of obstacles and hindrances that he may encounter such as but not limited to lack of resources, inadequate investigative leads and clues and others.
Investigate leads
The information gathered from people specially those who are within the immediate area where the crime took place.
Clues
The pieces of signs and traces which helps in identifying perpetrators.
Innovativeness
The flexibility and resourcefulness of the investigator in trying to uncover the identity and location of the perpetrator. This includes finding all possible ideas that he may take in the course of investigation.
Integrity
The honor and honesty of the investigator in solving the case and avoid unethical issues that will discredit his image.
Seminars
More in line with discussions or meetings
Trainings
More inclined with practical exercises and demonstrations.
Pink blotter: cases involving women and children (e.g. VAWC, sexual abuse, child abuse)