The top-down approach assumes that criminals have free will, which means they can choose whether or not to engage in criminal behavior.
Top-down approach
Useful for police in directing resources and understanding offender characteristics
Limited to certain crimes like murders, rapes, arsons
Not useful for more common crimes like burglary and property destruction
Top-down profiling can only be used for a limited range of crimes
More common offences such as burglary and destruction of property do not lend themselves to profiling because the resulting crime scene reveals very little about the offender
The top-down approach is a limited approach to identifying a criminal of only certain crimes
Problem with top-down approach research
Researchers only focus on one variable that could be the cause of an offender committing a crime
Some offenders could show characteristics of both organised and disorganised typologies
Content analysis on 100 cases of serial killers in the US found no clear distinction between organised and disorganised crimes
The criteria for identifying disorganised and organised crimes are too simplistic
Other factors such as individual personality differences between offenders need to be considered
Criticism of top-down approach
Problem of generalising the results to offenders of different crimes, locations, races, or genders
The original data is based on interviews with 36 of the most dangerous and sexually motivated murderers, which is not representative of all offenders
The top-down approach is not based in any science or theory
The accuracy of the profiles generated might be very subjective and open to interpretation
The Barnum Effect whereby vague evidence of the crime could be manipulated to fit into the characteristics of a particular type of offender
Profiling has the potential to cause harm if the profiles are wrong and mislead investigations
The bottom-up approach is considered more scientific as it is based on objective statistical techniques and computer analysis