If premises are true then the conclusion will be true
Infallibilism
for a belief to count as knowledge, it cannotberationally doubted. It must be true and justified in a way which makes it certainty.
What is Reliabilism?
Knowledge is a true belief the which has been formed by a reliablecognitiveprocess or reliablemethod. A reliable method being one such produced a highproportionoftruebelief.
What are the 4 pitfalls Zagzebski says we must avoid when defining knowledge?
Circular: Definition should not use the term being defined
Obscure: Term should not be more complex than the original term
Negative: Cannot simply define a term by saying what it is not
Ad hoc: Should not be specific to a particular problem
What is the No false lemmas theory and how does it cope with Gettier counter examples?
This theory grants knowledge on the basis of it being on a justified true belief that has not been formed by any false premises; for something to count as knowledge all the premises must be true.
This theory sets a higher standard for knowledge by requiring that true conclusions as well as true premises. Overcomes most gettier cases because they involve false premises
What is virtue epistemology and how does it cope with Gettier counter examples?