The land and factory owners were wealthy and powerful, while their workers lived in poverty
The two classes rarely interacted
The World Wars
Dismantled the British class system
The war effort
Brought people together
Rationing
Meant the different classes had to live similar lifestyles regardless of wealth
Despite this, class inequality still existed and this is what Priestley wanted to emphasise to his audience
The attitudes and prejudices that class hierarchy created were still ingrained in society, particularly in the minds of the upper class
The upper classes scorned (viewed with hatred) and mocked their working class peers
By revealing the destructive impact class hierarchy had in 1912, Priestley encourages 1940s society to move forwards towards social equality instead of returning to the old ways
The setting
The upper class Birlings initially live in blissful ignorance of others' suffering
The stage directions describe the lighting as "pink and intimate" (Act 1, pg 1), symbolising the Birlings' optimistic, rose-tinted perspective
The family are described as being "pleased with themselves" (Act 1, pg 2), revealing their complacency
Priestley implies the upper classes lack a conscience. They are not confronted with what their happiness costs others
Priestley uses the play to emphasise the divide between the rich and poor
The differences between classes make huge impacts on the characters and their experiences
Priestley shows how social class alienates the two groups so that neither interact, and this is emphasised by how we only ever see one working class character on stage
Priestley argues that the upper classes maintain the class system because it benefits them, allowing them to live in ignorance of how the working classes struggle
Priestley suggests that authorities and politicians don't realise that it is possible for one group to succeed and prosper while the other experiences a severe decline
Success for some does not mean success for all
Mr Birling's claims that the country is "in for a time of steadily increasing prosperity" (Act 1, pg 6) and "there'll be peace and prosperity and rapid progress everywhere" (Act 1, pg 7)
Overlooks the poverty, disease, and physical labour endured by the lower classes
Mr Birling doesn't consider that such "prosperity" and "progress" relies on the hard work of others
Mr Birling accuses the Inspector of ruining their evening
Contrasts with the Inspector's reply about the tragedy of Eva Smith's death
The echoing of the harsh, crude "nasty mess" alongside the adjective "promising" shows how tragic Eva's death is, and how distressing it is for Mr Birling to put his own minor troubles first
Eva Smith is symbolic of the lower classes as a whole
The audience's perspective of Eva is altered by the Birlings' classist remarks and personal bias
Priestley shows how easy it is for the upper classes to influence the narrative surrounding the working classes
The Birlings, and Mrs Birling in particular, can describe Eva in their own terms without being challenged, forming a new reality
Mr Birling
A member of the nouveau riche
Most concerned about his social class
Insecure about his standing but feels entitled to respect and power
A symbol of class conflict and the upper classes' reaction to this conflict
A symbol of upper class privilege, showing how the upper classes used their positions to evade conflict and responsibility
Mr Birling expects to be treated differently by the Inspector because he is a "public man", but the Inspector informs him that "Public men [...] have responsibilities as well as privileges"
When Mr Birling says "If you don't come down sharply on some of these people, they'd soon be for the earth", it becomes even clearer that he thinks it is his personal obligation to put the lower classes in their place
Priestley shows how the upper classes viewed any attempt by the lower classes to stand up for themselves as an outrageous, disrespectful act
Priestley demonstrates how the upper classes purposefully perpetuated (continued) the cycle of poverty and widened the class divide
Priestley includes the interactions between Mr Birling and Gerald to demonstrate how social class makes people act with ulterior motives and causes divisions where there doesn't need to be any
Gerald Croft & Mr Birling
Gerald Croft comes from a family that is of a higher class than the Birlings (Gerald is from old money whereas Mr Birling is considered nouveau riche)
The difference in class between the engaged couple (Gerald and Sheila) causes tension
Mr Birling is keen for the two to marry because it will help him climb the social ladder and grow his business
The Crofts are reluctant because the Birlings' lower social status will degrade them
Priestley implies that social class makes people selfish. People are only able to be motivated by opportunities to improve their own social position
Even Mr Birling is a victim to class prejudices, which makes his treatment of Eva ironic
Priestley suggests these attitudes are universally accepted and "only natural", leading to permanent divisions within communities
Mrs Birling
The epitome of upper class prejudice
Her "cold" demeanor and social superiority make her particularly judgemental and blunt
Makes assumptions about Eva because she is a working class girl, and these lead her to deny Eva any help from the charity
Believes all lower class people are immoral and money-hungry, and she is not afraid to admit it
When Mrs Birling recalls how Eva introduced herself as "Mrs Birling", she is outraged because she thinks it will sully or taint her name if it is used by a working class girl
Mrs Birling believes all lower class people are immoral and money-hungry, and she is not afraid to admit it
Mrs Birling: '"I think it was simply a piece of gross impertinence - quite deliberate - and naturally that was one of the things that prejudiced me against her case"'
Gross impertinence - quite deliberate
Demonstrates Mrs Birling's insistence that Eva intentionally stepped out of line and disrespected her
Adverb "naturally"
Implies Mrs Birling is justified in her "prejudice", even though she should be impartial and compassionate as a member of the charity