A field of psychology that deals with all aspects of human behaviour as it relates to the law or legal system
The first forensic psych study was conducted in 1895, and it was conducted by James Cattell
Cattell's study on recollection accuracy
Recollection is often inaccurate, especially when thinking about further dates (as short as a week ago)
Answers were often inaccurate and the relationship between accuracy and confidence in accuracy was very low
People thought they were more accurate than they actually were
Witness testimonies are probably not as accurate as we used to think
Binet's study on suggestibility
Children were more accurate in their recollections when asked to do free recall compared to when they were asked leading questions
Suggestibility applies to adults too
Narrow definition of forensic psychology
Clinical psychology as it pertains to the legal system; Assessing, treating, consulting etc.
Broad definition of forensic psychology
Research endeavour that examines human behaviour directly related to legal processes and clinical work within the legal system
Clinical forensic psychologists
Broadly concerned with the assessment and treatment of mental health issues as they pertain to the law or legal system
May work privately or in hospitals and prisons
May help rehabilitate prisoners, victims, etc.
May assess risk, suitability for jobs, readiness to return to work
Experimental forensic psychologists
May look at mental health like a clinical psychologist, but are usually interested in human behaviour, emotion, and cognition as it pertains to the legal system
May study memory, suggestibility, information processing during a crime, jury decision-making, eyewitness lineups, biases in law enforcement
Legal scholar
Someone who conducts research AND has a law degree
Relationships between psychology and law
Psychology and the law
Psychology in the law
Psychology of the law
Witness
Can testify about what they directly observed
Expert witness
Can provide court with their personal opinion on matters relevant to the case, based on their expertise
The first expert witness in the U.S. was in 1921: State v. Driver in West Virginia
Challenges in being an expert witness
Need a lot of training and experience as a psychologist
Need to study the cases in detail and have legal knowledge
Need to understand their role and communicate in a persuasive and helpful manner
Differences between psychology and law make it a challenging role
7 differences between psychology and law
Epistemology (truth)
Goals
Knowledge
Methods
Criteria
Principles
Behaviour in the legal system
General Acceptance test
For expert testimony to be admissible in court, the basis of the testimony has to be generally accepted within the relevant scientific community
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Supreme court laid out 4 criteria for accepting expert testimony: research has been peer reviewed, is testable, has recognized rate of error, and adheres to professional standards
Mohan Criteria
Testimony must be relevant, necessary to assist the trier of fact, must not violate any rules of exclusion, and must be provided by a qualified expert who is independent and impartial
During police selection procedures, we're screening out undesirable candidates or select in desirable candidates, evaluating their knowledge, skills, and abilities
Expert testimony must meet certain criteria to be admissible in court:
Expert testimony
Must be helpful to the common understanding of the court
Must teach the court something they don't already know
Must not violate any rules of exclusion
Providing testimony about past crimes could bias the jury, so anything that's prejudicial towards the defendant would not be admissible even if it's part of the expert testimony
Experts
Must be qualified
Must be independent and impartial
Independent
Having no conflicts of interest, usually when it comes to financial gain
The criteria for experts is somewhat at the discretion of the judge, so there's a degree of subjectivity
Police selection procedures
Screening out undesirable candidates
Selecting in desirable candidates
KSA
Knowledge, skills, abilities
Evaluating KSA
1. Selection interview
2. Personality tests
3. Cognitive ability tests
4. Assessment centres
The KSA that police agencies look for will differ from agency to agency
Police officers need to have a good memory, intimate knowledge of the law, good reasoning, verbal skills, and good logic
Personality tests
Used to assess if the potential officer's personality is a good fit for the job and to identify concerning behavior patterns
Personality tests used for police selection
MMPI
Inwald personality inventory
The Inwald personality inventory is more effective than more generalized personality tests for police selection
Cognitive ability tests measure memory, math, verbal skills, and reasoning
Assessment centres
Facilities where the behavior of police applicants can be observed in several situations by multiple observers
Assessment centres look at decisions that should be made in real life, not just reacting quickly and catching bad guys
Discretion
The freedom that a police officer has for deciding what should be done in any given situation
Police officers have to make quick judgements about whether to arrest someone, how to deal with a mental health crisis, when to use force, and whether someone is dangerous or drunk
The goal of a police interrogation is to obtain a confession of guilt from a suspect
Confessions are important because they save time during prosecution and conviction, and those who confess are more likely to be prosecuted and convicted