How susceptible a population is to a particular hazard
Hazard perception
People's circumstances affecting their perception of hazards
Human responses to hazards
Fatalism (accept it and get on with it)
Prediction (work out when and where it will occur)
Adaptation (change how you live)
Mitigation (reduce the impact)
Risk sharing (e.g. insurance)
Incidents (how often it will happen) and level of development affect human responses to hazards
Plate tectonics
Theory that the lithosphere is divided into plates that move
Evidence for plate tectonics
Continental drift (fossil remains, rock types, continent shapes)
Paleomagnetism
Plate movement processes
Convection currents
Slab pull
Ridge push
Layers of the Earth
Inner core
Outer core
Mantle
Crust (continental and oceanic)
Constructive/Divergent plate margin
Plates move apart, magma upwells, forms ocean ridges, rift valleys, volcanoes, earthquakes
Destructive/Convergent plate margin
One plate subducts under another, forms fold mountains, deep sea trenches, volcanoes, earthquakes
Oceanic-Oceanic convergence
Forms island arcs, deep sea trenches, volcanoes, earthquakes
Continental-Continental convergence
Forms fold mountains, earthquakes
Conservative plate margin
Plates move past each other, no subduction, only earthquakes
Hotspots/Magma plumes
Magma rises through plate, forms volcanoes not at plate margins
Park model
Describes stages of disaster response: pre-disaster, disruption, relief, rehabilitation, reconstruction
The Park model assumes human factors don't affect events, and that LICs/NEEs may not be able to afford improvements
The hazard management cycle is less suited to unexpected hazards and progress is less visible than the Park model
Primary volcanic hazards
Pyroclastic flows
Superheated gas
Ash fallout
Secondary volcanic hazards
Acid rain
Lahars
Factors affecting volcanic hazards
Magnitude
Frequency
Randomness
Predictability
Impacts of volcanic hazards
Economic
Political
Social
Environmental
Responses to volcanic hazards
Short-term
Long-term
Mount Pinatubo eruption
Largest eruption in 50 years
Over 600 years since last eruption
350 deaths
80,000 hectares of farmland buried
94% of deaths in evacuation camps
The responses to Mount Pinatubo were lacking in long-term management and preparation, despite evidence of past violent eruptions
Earthquakes
Caused by the build-up and sudden release of strain energy as plates jerk past each other
Epicenter
The point on the Earth's surface directly above the focus (origin) of an earthquake
The nature of earthquakes is affected by the type of plate margin, rate of plate movement, and depth of the focus
The local people that are left vulnerable use the geological evidence we're aware that volcano erupted violently in the past but still no preparation had been made so you could argue actually here they've been let down by the planning and the responses previously
Strain energy
Tension that builds up in plates that are going to jerk past each other, causing shock waves to spread out from the focus
Epicenter
The point on the earth's surface directly above the focus of an earthquake
Factors affecting the nature of earthquakes
Type of margin
Rate of movement
Depth of the focus
If worst came to worst you'd start thinking generically about exactly what could the impact of an earthquake be if it happened right now
Secondary seismic hazards
Tsunami
Other secondary impacts
Richter scale
Measures the magnitude of an earthquake, a logarithmic scale
Cali scale
Measures earthquakes using observations
Earthquake responses
Preparedness
Adaptation
Prevention
Socially, Kobe has lost a lot of traditional buildings but gained new earthquake resistant homes and suburban areas