Tendency to associate with members of the same species
Sociality
Importance in human life and psychology
Comparative study across species
Selection pressures favoring sociality
Habitat differences and exposure to predators
Dietary shifts and benefits of cooperative hunting
Influence of social interactions on foraging efficiency
Defense against threats within and between species
Selection pressures on human ancestors
Predation risk
Cooperative hunting
Resource distribution
Intra-species conflicts
Social behavior is essential for human well-being and has evolutionary roots
Costs and benefits influence the evolution of sociality across species
Understanding the selection pressures on social behavior helps explain human social tendencies
Comparative studies with African great apes offer insights into the evolution of human sociality
Multiple factors, including predation risk, resource distribution, and intra-species conflicts, contribute to the evolution of social behavior in human ancestors
Characteristics of foraging societies
Small, semi-nomadic bands with populations ranging from 10 to 30 individuals
Fluid membership allows for individuals and families to shift between bands based on opportunities
Dense kinship networks within these small communities
Selection pressures for sociality in ancestral humans
Predation risk in open habitats driving the need for social protection
Benefits of cooperative hunting and scavenging, potentially leading to group cohesion
Challenges of resource distribution and sharing, favoring social behaviors
Mitigation of inter-group conflicts through collective defense strategies
Kin selection theory
Highlights the influence of genetic relatedness on social interactions
Role of kinship in human social behavior
Kinship as a fundamental organizing principle in human societies, shaping group membership and behavior
Kinship-based cooperation in tasks such as land clearing, planting, and harvesting among various horticulturalist groups
Systematic sharing of resources, including food, among kin in both foraging and food-producing societies
Kin selection theory predicts
Decreased selfishness and aggression among genetic relatives
Empirical evidence from studies on domestic homicides supports the notion that individuals are less inclined to commit violence against kin
Historical and anthropological data from various cultures further illustrate the pattern of reduced aggression toward genetic relatives
Foraging societies provide insights into ancestral human social life, characterized by small, kin-based communities
Kinship plays a crucial role in shaping social interactions, cooperation, and conflict resolution across various human societies
Empirical evidence supports the predictions of kin selection theory, indicating reduced aggression and increased cooperation among genetic relatives
Altruism
People tend to be more altruistic towards kin compared to non-kin
Altruistic tendencies
Stronger in situations of dire need
Kin selection theory explains altruistic behaviors
Children living with genetic parents
Experience lower stress levels compared to those living with stepparents
Close kinship ties have a stress-reducing effect
Reciprocity in social behavior
Individuals are more likely to help when the cost is low, the need is urgent, and there is potential for reciprocity
Humans are inclined to behave altruistically towards reciprocators
Humans are adept at recognizing instances of cheating and avoiding interactions with potential cheaters
Individuals can often identify potential cheaters in advance, helping to avoid wasteful altruism
Concern for reputation
People are concerned about their reputation as cheaters or cooperators, influencing their behavior in social interactions
Many environmental problems resemble prisoners' dilemmas, such as the tragedy of the commons
Environmental decisions often involve a trade-off between personal gain (cheating) and communal benefit (cooperation)
Altruism spreads when reciprocated and when cheaters are punished, but environmental issues pose challenges as cheating may not be easily identifiable, and widespread non-cooperation complicates the acceptance of initial costs for eventual benefits
Policy interventions for environmental cooperation
Adjusting costs and benefits to encourage cooperation (e.g., tax credits for electric vehicles)
Pollution credit programs, like those for utility companies, punish polluters and reward cooperators, fostering cooperation
Humans naturally recognize and respond to differences in rank and status, like other social animals
Social dominance is salient in human interactions and influences behavior, even in subtle ways
Individuals modify their behavior based on perceived power differentials, seeking to confirm existing notions or gather accurate information depending on their perceived status relative to others