PSY260, Week 4-5, Classical Conditioning

Cards (34)

  • Hippocampus
    Important for spatial navigation and memory
  • Place cells
    • Whose receptive field seems to be a particular location or place that is familiar
    • In a rat, a place cell fires in arm 2 of the maze; rotating the landmarks shows the place cell defines "arm 2" based on these landmarks
  • Place cell
    Only responds to a specific place
  • Grid cell
    Creates a backdrop of a map
  • Unconditioned Response (UR)
    Preparatory response (e.g. salivation)
  • Conditioned Stimulus (CS)

    Computer sound
  • Conditioned Response (CR)
    Reaching for altoids
  • Classical Conditioning
    1. Begins with an innate (unlearned) reflex
    2. Unconditioned stimulus (US) [food]
    3. Unconditioned response (UR) [salivation]
    4. A neutral stimulus (CS) is then repeatedly presented before the reflex is triggered, producing a new reflex
    5. Conditioned stimulus (CS) [bell]
    6. Conditioned response (CR) [salivation]
  • Classical conditioning
    • Helps an organism prepare for the future (the bell triggers behaviours to prepare for the food)
    • Represents an association between the CS and the US (bell is associated with food)
  • Quail Sex Conditioning
    • Exposure to female (US) innately produces arousal (UR) in male quail
    • CS is a tone or light, initially neutral
    • After pairing the CS with the US, the CS comes to produce approach (CR)
  • Fear Conditioning: Fruit Flies
    • Add odor to compartment where shock happens
    • Flies, given a choice, start to avoid that compartment
    • Exposure to shock (US) innately produces escape/ avoidance behaviour
    • CS is an odour, initially neutral
    • After CS is paired with US, CS comes to produce avoidance (CR)
  • Aversive conditioning

    New CS → CR reflex helps avoid noxious US
  • Eyeblink Conditioning
    • Puff of air to eye (US) innately produces eyeblink (UR)
    • CS is a tone or light, comes to produce a gradual eye closure (CR)
    • Works on rabbits and humans, but takes many trials
    • The CR is not exactly the same as the UR: it takes place before the US and can be different in speed, form, etc.
  • In most cases, classical conditioning builds gradually over many trials
  • Conditioned Compensatory Response
    A CR that is the opposite of the UR, helping to balance/correct for the US-UR reflex
  • Extinction
    1. Breaking the association between the CS and US can extinguish the new CS → CR reflex
    2. Present the CS alone repeatedly
    3. Initially, CS evokes strong CRs
    4. With repetition, however, CS becomes less effective, similar to beginning of training
  • Extinction does not erase the CS-US connection, just inhibits it
  • Renewal
    Return of responding to a previously extinguished CS, when that CS is tested in a context that is different from the extinction context
  • Delay Conditioning
    CS comes on and the US is presented right at the end of the CS
  • Trace Conditioning
    CS comes on then ends, followed by a trace interval and then the US is presented
  • Trace conditioning only works well if the trace interval isn't super long
  • Blocking
    Prior experience with the light + US association blocks learning of the tone + US association
  • Latent Inhibition
    Pre-exposure to CS repeatedly inhibits learning when CS is later paired with US
  • Associative Bias/ Biological Preparedness
    Some associations are innately easier to make
  • Stimulus-Stimulus (S-S)

    • Classical conditioning is the CS-CR formation in prediction of US
    • However representation of US can modify CR
    • Classical conditioning is not just an S-R association
  • CS Modulation Theory
    • Stimuli have a salience that determines attention
    • Repeated exposure with no consequences decreases salience (attention), a form of habituation
    • In latent inhibition, pre-exposure to the CS decreases attention for that stimulus, making it harder to learn about in the training phase
  • Error-Prediction learning
    Learning through trial and error to reduce discrepancy (error) between what is predicted and what actually occurs
  • Rescorla-Wagner model

    • Based on learning from errors
    • Does not predict latent inhibition
  • Mammalian Conditioning of Motor Reflexes
    • CS input pathway: Sensory input processed in various brain regions, Sensory nuclei of the pontine nuclei, Mossy fibers split to cerebellar cortex and interpositus nucleus
    • US input pathway: Inferior olive of midbrain to climbing fibers that split to interpositus nucleus and Purkinje neurons in the cerebellar cortex
    • CR output: Purkinje cells of cerebellar cortex, which collects both CS and US input, Inhibits output neurons of the interpositus nucleus
  • CS-US association may be stored in Purkinje cells of the cerebellar cortex and cerebellar interpositus nucleus (eyeblink CR pathway)
  • In many well-trained animals, the Purkinje cells switch off in response to the CS, shutting off the Purkinje inhibition to the interpositus enables the CS to generate CRs
  • Electrical stimulation of pontine + inferior olive or CS + US can create CS-US association without "experience"
  • Inhibitory feedback pathway projects from the interpositus nucleus of the inferior olive, in a well-trained animal, production of CR will inhibit the inferior olive from sending US information to Purkinje cells
  • The Hippocampus in CS Modulation

    • Removal of the hippocampus does not alter basic classical conditioning paradigms, but does eliminate latent inhibition and disrupt other paradigms that depend on changes in the processing of the CS
    • US modulation (Rescorla-Wagner) occurs in the cerebellum, CS modulation (Mackintosh) occurs in the hippocampus and medial temporal lobe