Social stratification describes the society is structured in a hierarchy of unequal layers uneven distribution of wealth of the class system middle upper and lower class and is not always done on a universal standard
What is the Davis-Moore thesis on stratification and what theory are they from ?
Davis and Moore put forward a functionalist theory of stratification. They argue that it's necessary for society to ensure that important roles in society are filled and that some roles are more functionally important than others.
- these roles are filled by role allocation most people lack the talent to fill these roles or the motivation required to train for them, so to attract people to these roles, society must offer higher rewards such as high pay and status.
Stratification is therefore necessary for society because it ensures that the most talented people train for and fill the most important jobs.
What do the Davis-Moore say about stratification ?
Davis and Moore, all societies must have a degree of inequality built into them, because society needs to treat people differently in regards to their status and rewards.By this logic inequality is functional because people see it as fair. The universal nature of stratification means inequality is not only unavoidable but necessary for smooth working of society.
Anomalies - Not all the jobs that are vital to society attract high salaries (such as nursing), or have high status (e.g. refuse collection).
- Status - High pay and status might be linked to a group's power, rather than to the functional importance of the role.
- Marxists would argue that society is not meritocratic (based on people's effort, skills and talents) because those born into wealth and higher status are able to use this to their advantage while exploiting and preventing those with less power, wealth and status from succeeding.
Society is divided into different socio-economic classes. the social standing or class of an individual or group and is often measured as a combination of education, income and occupation.
According to Weber, a class is a group of people who have similar life chances, such as being successful in life and opportunities in education, health, and other areas.
Life chances refers to the positive or negative outcomes over the lifetime in factors such as health, education, employment and housing. Life chances are distributed unequally between groups due to class, gender and ethnicity.
In the 1950/60s, some sociologists began to suggest that the more affluent working classes were becoming middle class in their norms and values.
Embourgeoisment when working class famillies taken on the norms and value of those of the upper class living a privatised and afleunt lifestyle discarding their old ideas of community and solidarity this is a result of improved living standards and income
Murray (1996) argued that the underclass in the UK is growing rapidly.
He focused on the behaviour of the 'undeserving poor' and associated them with rising crime rates, an increase in the number of 'illegitimate' births and drop-out from the labour market among working-age men.
He argued that welfare reform encouraged crime, single parenthood and unemployment, as well as taking away the incentive to work.
Murray associated the underclass with poor African-American and Hispanic people and argued that the underclass posed a threat to society's wellbeing because its members are responsible for increases in crime rates and a burden to taxpayers.
Sylvia Walby (1990) defined patriarchy as a system of social structures and practices in which men dominate and exploit women, and highlighted six patriarchal structures.