Socially constructed, dependent on social location, factors include time, age, gender, cultural norms and values
Crime and deviance
Subjective, depend on socialopinion, norms and values of a society
Sociological theories on crime and deviance
Examine causes of crime
Consider impact of crime on socialorder
Explain how those in power maintain social order through social control
Functionalists
Examine function of crime and deviance in society, how they impact social order and how society controls behavior
Durkheim
Focused on impacts of crime on established social order, suggested crime has both positive and negative impacts
Merton
Suggested existing social order causes crime, as society expects conformity to idealized norms and values
Hirschi
Explained role of social control in preventing deviant behavior, those less integrated into society more likely to become criminal
Subcultural theories
Groups react to norms and values of society due to inability to achieve socially approved goals, seek status through criminal/deviant activities
Marxist views
Ruling class use power to exert control over working classes through ideology and physical force, ignore crimes of powerful, focus on crimes of powerless
Neo-Marxist views
Individuals develop agency in response to excessive controls, resulting in criminal behaviors as resistance
Feminist views
Different levels of control over males and females, reflected in reporting, recording and punishment of crime
Women subjected to social controls limiting opportunities to commit crime, policed through informal controls
Interactionist views
Crime result of interactions between individuals
Deviance not defined by individual but by wider society
Media used as form of social control, amplifying petty offenses and generating moral panics
Labeling as form of social control leading to social isolation
Realist theories
See crime as serious problem requiring realistic solutions
Right realists focus on controlling individuals, reducing opportunities and harsher punishments
Left realists look to tackle inequalities, provide opportunities for legitimate status
Functionalist theories of crime and deviance
Theories that explain how crime and deviance function in and for society
Durkheim's theory of social change
1. Organic change - gradual social changes that advance society
2. Mechanical/engineered solidarity - social changes through institutions like education
Rapid social changes after industrial revolution
Led to unwanted changes in society, loss of organic solidarity, shift towards mechanical solidarity
Anomie
Drift away from the norms and values of society
Durkheim suggested crime was inevitable in modern society and a certain level was desirable
Too much crime would lead to decay of society's norms and values, too little would stagnate growth
Boundary maintenance
Social reactions to criminal behaviour that reinforce the value consensus of society
Boundary maintenance examples
Public reactions to terrorist attacks
Public condemnation of 2011 riots in UK
Adaptation and change
Deviant behaviour demonstrates changing attitudes towards established social order, leads to gradual change in norms and values
Adaptation and change examples
Civil rights movement
Gay rights movement
Women's liberation movement
Removal of slavery statues
Other functions of crime suggested by Durkheim include safety valve and social release
Criticisms of Durkheim's theory include difficulty defining optimal level of crime, lack of explanation for how crime occurs, and reduced effect of deviance in contemporary society
Merton's views on the role of crime and deviance
Suggested that dysfunction existed in society, unlike other functionalists
Suggested that there was structural inequality in society
Suggested that the insistence of promoting the American Dream of wealth and power led to a strain to deviate from the norms and values of society
American Dream
Shared by most Americans, but society did not provide clear guidelines on how to achieve it
Strain to deviate from norms and values of society
Inevitably leads to criminal and deviant behaviors
Merton's five different adaptations to strain
Conformity
Innovation
Ritualism
Retreatism
Rebellion
Conformity
Accepting the American Dream of wealth and power and actively pursuing it through legitimate means
Innovation
Accepting the socially approved goals but choosing illegitimate means of achieving the American Dream
Innovation
Organized crime syndicates
White-collar criminals
Corporate criminals
Criminals focused on utilitarian crimes for financial gain
Ritualism
Accepting they were unlikely to achieve the American Dream, but content to conform to society's norms and values through legitimate means
Ritualists
People in routine occupations, administrative roles, middle management
Retreatism
Rejecting the socially approved goals and legitimate means of achieving the American Dream, leading to drug/alcohol abuse, petty crimes, vagrancy
Rebellion
Challenging the socially approved goals and looking to create alternative visions of society, rejecting legitimate means
Rebellion
Political dissidents, activists, protesters
Merton's strain theory recognizes the role of structural inequality in crime and highlights how lack of opportunities can impact different social groups
Merton's theory offers a rational explanation for crimes committed for financial gain, but does not explain crimes of passion or violent crimes