Observing and recording behaviour in structured environment where variables are managed
Covert observation
Recording P's behaviour w/o their knowledge nor consent
Covert observation limitations
Ethical violations: Informed consent - no knowledge of observation meant they were unable to give consent
Right to withdraw - no knowledge of observation meant they were unable to decide if wanted to participate
Deception - were not told they were being observed therefore acted as if they weren't be watched
Covert observation strength
Reduced demand characteristics - natural and authentic behaviour there allows for rich data and dig deeper into the group's behaviour therefore enhances internal validity
Naturalistic observation
Observing and recording behavior in naturally occurring situations without trying to manipulate and control the situation
Usual environment - everyday behaviour therefore high external validity
Generalisable - natural behaviour can apply to other people who act the same way in the same setting
Naturalistic observation limitations
EVs uncontrolled - difficult to detect patterns and cannot determine cause and effect therefore low internal validity
Subjective observations
Non-participant observation
Observer is external/outside of observed group
Non-participant observation limitation
Low external validity - lack of insight from being too removed means misinterpretation and possible observer bias
Non-participant observation strengths
Efficient data recording - observe what you see
More objective - psychological distance established therefore no bias
Overt observation
Researcher is open about intentions and seeks consent from Ps who know they are being observed
Overt observation limitation
Low internal validity - demand characteristics effects from awareness of study's aim
Overt observation strengths
Ethical considerations: informed consent
Right to withdraw - knowing study aims meant Ps able to decide if they want to remain in the study before it's too late
Participant observation
Observer becomes a member of the observed group of Ps
Participant observation limitations
Deception - Ps may confide and provide personal info to observer w/o knowing it is for a study
Subjectivity/Observer bias - bringing own bias when identifying with Ps, loss of objectivity
Participant observation strengths
Normal P behaviour - are in their normal environments
New insights and direction for research - observer builds rapport with Ps
Rich source of qualitative data - detailed conversations and descriptions of Ps' feelings