Social influence in direct response to an order from another person
Milgram (Aim)
To investigate whether in certain circumstances a normal person would give somebody a potentially lethal electric shock if told to by an authority figure
Milgram (Procedure)
Yale uni with 40male volunteers - the participant was the teacher and the confederates were the learner and experimenter - participants were told the study was about if punishment affects learning - told to give (fake) electric shocks of increasing voltage each time learner made a mistake
Milgram (Reactions)
The teacher heard pre-recorded cries of distress - at 300V there was pounding on the wall - from 315V there was silence - teacher told to continue by experimenter
Experimenter: 'Theexperimentrequires that you continue'
Milgram (Findings)
100% went to 300V, 65% went to the full 450V - 3 had full seizures - after debrief 84% were glad they participated
Predicted percentage for 450V was 3%
Milgram (Conclusion)
Ordinary people are obedient to authority, even when asked to behave in an inhumane manner
Milgram Limitations
Ethical issues (deception, protection from psychological harm)
Hofling et al - nurses on a ward obeyed unjust demands by doctors (21/22)
Orne and Holland - participants didn'tbelieve the set-up of Milgram's study, with the experimenter being calm throughout leading participants to suppose there was no harm
Milgram's situational variables
Proximity
Uniform
Location
Proximity variable
1. T and L in same room = obedience drops to 40%
2. T and L touching = obedience drops to 30%
3. E giving instructions over the phone to T = obedience drops to 20.5%
Uniform variable
Experimenter called away and replaced with a casually dressed confederate = obedience drops to 20%
Location variable
Location moved to run-down office block = obedience drops to 47.5%
Bickman - 3 confederates dressed as a guard, milkman and civilian ask public to pick up litter - 2x as likely to obey guard rather than civilian
Smith and Bond - Milgram's study is in Western culture and is not cross-cultural
Agentic state
Acting for someone else so take no responsibility (an agent)
Autonomous state
Feel free to behave on their own and have responsibility
Agentic shift
Move from autonomous state to agentic state
Binding factors
Aspects that allow the person to ignore the damaging effects of their behaviour
Legitimacy of Authority
We obey people who have a higher position of power within a social hierarchy as their authority is 'legitimate'
MyLai Massacre - 504 civilians killed by American soldiers who were 'doing their duty' and 'followingorders'
Blass and Smith - students watched Milgram's study and said the experimenter was to blame for the harm
Rank and Jacobson - 16/18 nurses disobeyed orders from a doctor to administer excessive drugs to patients
Adorno
Wanted to understand anti-semitism of the holocaust
Authoritarian personality
Shows extreme respect for authority, views society as 'weaker' that it was, need strong leaders to enforce traditional values, inflexible outlook
Scapegoating
Displacing onto others perceived as weaker
Adorno (Procedure)
2000+ middle class white Americans - developed F-scale - participants had to agree or disagree with controversialstatements
Adorno (Findings)
High scores were associated with highauthoritarian personality - found a strongpositive correlation between authoritarianism and prejudice
Milgram and Elms - interviews with 20 participants who went to 450V and found high levels of authoritarian personality and scored high on F-scale
Adorno limitation - pre-war germany showed millions who were already anti-semitic - it's unlikely they all had the authoritarian personality