Endometrial carcinoma is the most common malignancyof the female genital tract, accounting for almost one-half of all gynecologic cancers in the United States
In 2018, an estimated 63,230 new cases and 11,350 cancer-related deaths are anticipated
Endometrialcarcinoma is the fourth most common cancer, ranking behind breast, lung, and colorectal cancers, and the sixth leading cause of death from malignancy in women
Overall, about 2.8% of women develop endometrial cancer during their lifetimes
Endometrial cancer is a disease that occurs primarily in postmenopausal women and is increasingly virulent with advancing age
Type I endometrial cancer
Occurs in younger, perimenopausal women with a history of exposure to unopposedestrogen, either endogenous or exogenous. Tumors begin as hyperplastic endometrium and progress to carcinoma. These "estrogen-dependent" tumors tend to be better differentiated and have a more favorable prognosis than tumors not associated with hyperestrogenism
Type II endometrial cancer
Occurs in women without estrogenic stimulation of theendometrium. These spontaneously occurring cancers are not pathologically associated with endometrial hyperplasia, but may arise in a background of atrophic endometrium. They are less differentiated and associated with a poorer prognosis than estrogen-dependent tumors. These "estrogen-independent" tumors tend to occur in older, postmenopausal, thin women and are present disproportionately in African American and Asian women
Risk factors for endometrial cancer
Nulliparity
Late menopause
Obesity
Diabetes mellitus
Unopposed estrogen therapy
Tamoxifen therapy
Atypical endometrial hyperplasia
Lynch II syndrome
Endometrial hyperplasia
Represents a spectrum of morphologic and biologic alterations of the endometrial glands and stroma, ranging from an exaggerated physiologic state to carcinoma in situ
Types of endometrial hyperplasia
Simple (cystic without atypia)
Complex (adenomatous without atypia)
Atypical simple (cystic with atypia)
Atypical complex (adenomatous with atypia)
The risk of endometrial hyperplasia progressing to carcinoma is related to the presence and severity of cytologic atypia
25% to 43% of patients with atypical hyperplasia detected in an endometrial biopsy or curettage specimen will have an associated, usually well-differentiated, endometrial carcinoma detected during hysterectomy
Fertility-sparing treatment of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer
Nonsurgical treatment with hormonal therapy may be an option for appropriately selected women desiring to preservefertility.Highregression rates for endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia following treatment withprogestin therapy are extensively documented
Progestational therapy can successfully treat disease while preserving fertility for patients with atypical hyperplasia and well-differentiated presumed stageI endometrialcancer
Only 1month of progestational treatment was required to achieve a response in the 76% of patients without recurrence
Twenty patients achieved pregnancy following treatment
24% (19/81) of the original cohort never responded to treatment, and only 68% had any documented follow-up endometrial sampling
Progestational therapy
Can successfully treat disease while preserving fertility for patients with atypical hyperplasia and well-differentiated presumed stage I endometrial cancer
Appropriate patient selection and exclusion criteria remain undefined
Patients must be counseled that failure to identify recurrence or extension of disease during progestational treatment may lead to a delay in definitive surgery and ultimately a compromised prognosis
Continuous progestin therapy with megestrol acetate (40 to 160 mg per day)
Probably the most reliable treatment for reversing complex or atypical hyperplasia, recognizing that higherdoses may be associated with reduced compliance secondary to side effects
No clear consensus exists for an optimal follow-up interval
Therapy should be continued for at least 3to 6 months, and endometrial biopsy should be performed to assess response
Periodic endometrial biopsy or transvaginal ultrasonography is advisable in patients being monitored on progestin therapy for atypical hyperplasia because of the presence of undiagnosed cancer in at least 25% of cases and the high recurrence rate after treatment with progestins
In this setting the use of progesterone should be considered a temporary, rather than long-term, treatment
For women with atypical complex hyperplasia who no longer desire fertility, hysterectomy is recommended
Screening for endometrial cancer should not be undertaken because of the lack of an appropriate, cost-effective, and acceptable test that reduces mortality
Routine Papanicolaou (Pap) testing is inadequate, and endometrial cytologic assessment is too insensitive and nonspecific to be useful in screening for endometrial cancer, even in a high-risk population
Transvaginal ultrasonographic examination of the uterus and endometrial biopsy are too expensive to be employed as screening tests
Screening for endometrial cancer or its precursors may be justified for certain high-risk women, such as members of families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer
Women taking tamoxifen receive nobenefit from routine screening with transvaginal ultrasonography or endometrial biopsy
There is insufficient evidence to recommend screening for endometrial cancer in women because of a history of unopposed estrogen therapy, late menopause, nulliparity, infertility or failure to ovulate, obesity, diabetes, or hypertension
Most patients with endometrialcancer present with abnormal perimenopausal orpostmenopausal uterine bleeding when the tumor is still confined to the uterus
Application of an appropriate and accurate diagnostic test in this situation usually results in early diagnosis and high cure rate with timely treatment
It is important to recognize that the workup of abnormal uterine bleeding should include endometrialbiopsy even in premenopausal patients, as 5% of cases are in women under the age of 40
Most endometrial carcinomas are sporadic, but at least 10% of cases have a hereditary basis
Two genetic models were described in the development of familial endometrial cancer: Lynch II syndrome and patients with a predisposition for endometrial cancer alone, both of which are inherited in anautosomal dominant fashion
The majority of studies focused on the increased incidence of endometrial cancer associated with Lynch II syndrome, a highly penetrant disorder (80% to 85%)
Lynch II syndrome is caused by an inherited mutation in one of the following mismatch repair genes: hMSH2, hMLH1, PMS1, PMS2, or hMSH6
The lifetime risk of endometrial cancer in women withLynch II syndrome is 32% to 60% and the lifetime risk of ovarian cancer is 10% to 12%