A conflict between: What the researcher needs to do in order to conduct useful and meaningful research AND the rights of the participants.
Valid Consent
Giving participants enough information so that they can make an informed choice about whether they wish to participate
Valid Consent - Researcher's POV
Revealing true aims of study + what is going to happen in the study
However - may cause participants to guess aims of study and act in answer in SOCIALLY DESIRABLE WAY
Valid Consent - Participants' POV
Even if researchers have obtained valid consent,
it does not guarantee that participants really do understand what they have let themselves in for.
The researcher must point out any likely benefits or risks of participation
Deception
Deliberately misleading or falsely informing participants about the nature of research
Deception - Researcher's POV
Sometimes
it is necessary to deceive the participants about the true aims of the study, as otherwise participants might alter the behaviour and the study could be meaningless.
HOWEVER
distinction between withholding some details of the research aims to deliberately providing false information
Deception - Participants' POV
Unethical - u cannot give valid consent
Lead people to see psychologists as untrustworthy - may not want to take part in future
Risk of harm
Research could induce more than minimal pain through repetitive or prolonged testing.
Invasive testing (administrating drugs or vigorous physical exercise etc) isn't encountered in everyday life = unethical
Risk of harm - Researcher's POV
Difficult to predict the outcome of certain procedures
Risk of harm - Participants' POV
Nothing should happen to them during a study that causes harm - many ways harm can be caused
Acceptable if risk is no greater than ordinary life
Confidentiality
Third parties should not be able to trace information back to individual participants - usually achieved through providing anonymity (using participant numbers not names e.g)
Confidentiality - Researcher's POV
Difficult to protect - researcher wishes to publish the findings
Anonymity - may be obvious
Confidentiality - Participants' POV
The data protection act - makes confidentiality a legal right
only acceptable for personal data to be recorded if the data are not made available in a form that identifies the participant
Privacy
Research that is likely to face this type of risk focuses on socially sensitive topics (e.g. sexuality) - includes potentially sensitive data (e.g. confidential documents)
Privacy - Researcher's POV
It may be different to avoid invasion of privacy when studying participants' without their awareness (e.g. - field experiment)
Privacy - Participants' POV
People do not expect to be observed by others in certain situations
Working with vulnerable individuals (incl. children)
Children under 16, those lacking in mental capacity, people in care, people in custody (prison or probation) + people engaged with legal activities (drug use)
Working with animals
Research with non-human species = strictly controlled
Restrictions on type of animal, care, number of animals required etc - all controlled by ethical guidelines and laws such as the Animals Act (1986)