increasing the size of the majority group causes more social influence, but this is maximal at 4confederates and it doesn't significantly increase past Asch's original 36.8% after this point
Unanimity variation:
one confederate provided the right answer, and gave support to the PTP
1 confederate = 5.5% conformity rate
Unanimity conclusions:
Breaking unanimity reduces the conformity effect, having a supportive confederate gives a PTP confidence to give the correct answer
Task difficulty variations:
the previouslyambiguous task became moredifficult as lines became closer together and harder to distinguish
harder task = 57% conformity
Task difficulty conclusions:
Increasing task difficulty causes conformity rates to increase at PTPS now experience both NSI and ISI
Who did an experiment into conformity to social roles?
Zimbardo?
Stanford experiment procedure:
24male students randomlyallocated to role of prisoner or guard, both experienced deindividualisation
Zimbardo acted as the superintendent, making it an overtparticipantobservation
it was planned to run for 14 days
Stanford experiment findings:
guards and prisoners conformed to their social roles
guards - became violent and physically and psychologically harmed the prisoners, prisoners - became very distressed and talked a lot about their 'prison life'
the experiment was cut short and stopped after 6 days
Stanford experiment conclusions:
Zimbardo provides evidence for identification - changed their private and public behaviour when they identify with the majority group