Human differences historically recognized - role of differentiating and identifying groups
Physical and cultural traits indicating someone's place of origin or national affiliation
Modern understanding of race
Racial discourses emphasized differences and categorized human groups according into a social hierarchy - racism
Biology, inherited characteristics, people from different "nature"
Colonialism justified the dominance over "primitive" groups
Race was associated with mental characteristics: intellect, habits, morality
Theory of subspecies: different human "breeds" - proven false because the genetic differences (gene mapping) between races is not significant
Racial studies in the mid-20th century: biological understanding of race is false
Race does not provide an accurate representation of human biological variation (...) Humans are not divided biologically into distinct continental types or racial genetic clusters. Instead, the Western concept of race must be understood as a classification system that emerged from, and in support of, European colonialism, oppression, and discrimination (American Association of Physical Anthropologists, 2019)
Criminology
Emerged as a scientific discipline in the 19th century
Positivist criminology: attempts to study the biological and physical differences between humans and associate them with behaviors
Promise of scientific explanations of crime and effective policies of crime control
Criminology
Auxiliary science to colonialism: social control of the racialized other
Criminology, whiteness and the study of crime
Eurocentrism, white supremacy
Whiteness upholding the values of civilization, civility, humanism, cordiality, peace, control of impulses
Whites who committed crimes deviated from their "Whiteness"
Many theories defend the biological behavioral differences between races
Justified the differential treatment of non-white groups
Treated non-white races as "objects of study"
Rejected the knowledge and perspective of non-white groups
Valued the Western criminological knowledge as the scientific truth
Critical race studies and critical criminology challenged the racist assumptions of mainstream criminology
Raised attention to racial inequalities in the social construction of crime (labeling)
Challenged the collaboration between criminology, colonialism, and the White dominance in the political system - knowledge as power, construction of reality
Context: Civil rights movement (1960s and 70s), social movements demanding racial justice, decolonization wave and independence of former colonized nations in Africa and Asia, critical studies about imperialism
Race and criminology in the North America: slavery, segregation, modern "color-blind" racism
Slave Regime: criminalization punished those who resisted, revolted or escaped
Segregation: criminalization upheld exclusion
"Color-blind racism": criminalization allegedly equal, but over-policing, surveillance, and punishment
Restriction of civil rights and socioeconomic opportunities for convicts
Criminal Justice System as the rearticulation of the State-enforced control over Black people after slavery
Discriminatory treatment: over-surveillance, more likely to be stopped and questioned, charged, more severely sentenced and disproportionately incarcerated
Vulnerability to harm and death
Demonization and association of Blackness and criminality
Officer Darren Wilson: 'The only way I can describe it, it looks like a demon, that's how angry he looked. He comes back towards me again with his hands up'
Popular justification for racial disparities in the CJS: Blacks commit more crimes
Historical association between Blackness and criminality and its social function
Slavery, the presence of Black people in public spaces raised suspicion of "runaway"
Maintenance of the "racial order" - subalternization of Black communities
Criminalization of migration from non-white nations
Criminal behavior is distributed across race and class
Filtering of crime: most people commit crime, but few are caught, arrested, charged, prosecuted, convicted and imprisoned
Labeling and race: Blacks are disproportionately policed and more likely to be considered guilty of a crime
Racial Profiling
Police officers have discretion to decide how and where to seek out crime based on ideas about who is suspicious
Stereotypes and popular beliefs about race
Profiling as a self-fulfilling prophecy: "The more a group is targeted, the greater the likelihood that criminality will be discovered" (Tanovich in Maynard, p. 87)
Over-policing as a form of violence: state of constant fear and anxiety, feeling unsafe to walk in public spaces
Surveillance vs. privacy: collection of personal information for a police database
Carding: identity checks, searches, seizures, car stops
Young Black males are "carded at a rate of 3.4 times that of their population in the city [Toronto], and these rates are were even higher for Black people stopped in predominantly white neighborhoods" (p. 89)
2013, public outrage, reduction of carding in 75% - however, the proportion of Black individuals carded increased
Police profiling targeting Black youth, despite youth not being representative in violent crimes and public danger
Justification: the public perception, "fabricated profile of young Black people as possible dangerous gang members" (p. 91)
Militarization and over-surveillance of Black neighborhoods
Impacts to the day-to-day lives of residents - impacts on the psychological well-being, post-traumatic stress disorder, and alienation from society
The criminalization of drugs was instrumental for the police control over racialized communities
1970: Nixon declared war on drugs; 1987: Prime Minister Mulroney's first five-year National Drug Strategy
1980s, moral panic about drugs (crack cocaine) and the Black communities
The use of drugs had been decreasing since the end of the 1970s
War: police campaign to eradicate illegal substances that were believed to be ravaging communities
Strengthened the powers of law enforcement officers to intervene over suspected individuals - stereotypical association between Blackness and drug crimes
Two gangs
Colombian and Jamaican
Disputing over the control of drug traffic in Los Angeles
Fear of racialized gangs and violence stemming from the drug business
Violence out of control, gangs are stronger than the police
The criminalization of drugs was instrumental for the police control over racialized communities
Nixon declared war on drugs
1970
Prime Minister Mulroney's first five-year National Drug Strategy
1987
1980s, moral panic about drugs (crack cocaine) and the Black communities
The use of drugs had been decreasing since the end of the 1970s
War on Drugs
Police campaign to eradicate illegal substances that were believed to be ravaging communities
Strengthened the powers of law enforcement officers to intervene over suspected individuals – stereotypical association between Blackness and drugs
State divestment from welfare and assistance programs to invest in the law enforcement
Backlash against social and racial justice movements of the 1960s and 70s – Black activism seen as a threat to Canada's national security