1.2.2 Responses to Tectonic Hazards

Cards (18)

  • -Primary Hazard
    Tectonic Hazard - Earthquake
    • Buildings and homes destroyed/damaged
    • People injured/killed
    • Transport routes destroyed/damaged
    • Water/gas/electricity supplies cut
  • -Primary Effects
    Tectonic Hazard - Volcanic eruption
    • Buildings, homes and farmland destroyed/damaged
    • People injured/killed
    • Transport routes destroyed/damaged
    • Aircraft grounded due to ash in the atmosphere
    • Contaminated water supply
    • Ash fall buries houses/crops
  • -Secondary Effects
    Tectonic Hazard - Earthquake
    • Economy slows as businesses take time to re-establish and money is spent on rebuilding
    • Aid struggles to reach those in need due to damaged/destroyed transport routes
    • Fires start due to broken gas and electricity supplies
    • Lack of clean water leads to disease
    • Damaged/destroyed homes lead to homelessness
    • Food prices increase
  • -Secondary Effects
    Tectonic Hazard - Volcanic eruption
    • Economy slows as businesses take time to re-establish and money is spent on rebuilding
    • Aid struggles to reach those in need due to damaged/destroyed transport routes
    • Lack of clean water leads to disease
    • Damaged/destroyed homes lead to homelessness
    • Flooding caused by ice/snow melting on the volcano slopes may also cause lahars
    • Food prices increase
    • Primary effects are those which occur as a direct result of the earthquake or volcanic eruption. For example, buildings collapsing is a direct result of the earthquake ground shaking.
    • Secondary effects are those things which result from the primary hazards. For example, fires caused by gas mains which have fractured.
  • Immediate & Long Term Responses
    • The responses to any tectonic hazard can be divided into two groups
    • Immediate in the days and weeks after the event
    • Long term in the months and years after the event
  • Immediate Response to Tectonic Hazards
    • Rescue teams search for survivors
    • Medical assistance for those injured
    • Shelter provided for homeless
    • Food and water provided
    • Recovery and burial of bodies
    • Warnings issued if possible
    • Evacuation 
    • Clearing ash and debris
  • The Long-term Response to Tectonic Hazard
    • Rebuild homes and other buildings
    • Improve building regulations
    • Improve drills, evacuation plans and warning systems
    • Repair water, gas and electricity supplies
    • Money given to farms for seed and new livestock
    • Data from eruptions used to improve future predictions
    • Government planning improved
    • Transport routes rebuilt
  • Example Case Study: Nepal
    • Nepal is one of the poorest countries in the world with a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of under $1000 in 2015
    • Located between China and India, Nepal is a landlocked country
    • In 2015 80% of the population lived in rural, often remote, communities
    • In April 2015 at 11.26 am Nepal was struck by an earthquake, magnitude 7.8
    • The epicentre was 80 km northwest of Kathmandu in the Gorka district
    • The focus was shallow at only 15 km beneath the surface
    • Over 300 aftershocks followed the main earthquake
  • Cause (of Nepal earthquake)
    • Nepal is located on a collision boundary between the Indian and Eurasian plates
  • Effects (of Nepal earthquake)
    • Approximately 9000 deaths 
    • Over 20,000 people injured
    • Electricity and water supplies cut
    • 7000 schools and 1000 health facilities were damaged or destroyed
    • Almost 3.5 million people were made homeless
    • Offices, shops and factories were destroyed meaning people were unable to make a living
    • UNESCO world heritage sites destroyed as well as many temples
    • Loss of tourist income which Nepal is reliant on
    • Avalanches on Mount Everest and in the Langtang Valley
    • Landslides which blocked roads and rivers
    • Damages estimated at between $7 and $10 billion about 35% of the GDP
  • Immediate responses (of Nepal earthquake)
    • Donations of money and aid from around the world totally $3 billion including $3.3 million from China and $51 million from the UK 
    • Many countries sent aid in the form of:
    • Temporary shelters
    • Medicines
    • Food
    • Water
    • Clothing
    • Search and rescue teams
    • Medical staff
    • 90% of the Nepalese army were mobilised 
    • Tent cities were set up in Kathmandu for those made homeless
    • GIS crisis mapping tool was used to co-ordinate the response
    • $3 million grant was provided by the Asian Development Bank for emergency relief.
  • Long term response (of Nepal earthquake)
    • Landslides were cleared and roads repaired to restore access to remote rural communities
    • Schools were rebuilt
    • Earthquake drills were introduced to provide people with education about what to do in the event of an earthquake
    • Stricter building codes with more enforcement
    • $200 million was provided by the Asian Development Bank for rebuilding
    • A new government task force was set up to plan for future earthquake events.
  • Example Case Study: Italy
    Background
    • Italy is a High-Income Country (HIC) with a GDP per capita of over $31,000
    • It is located in Europe 
    • On 24 August 2016 central Italy was struck by a magnitude 6.2 earthquake
    • The epicentre was 100 miles to the north-east of Rome
    • The focus was shallow at only 4.4km
    • Over 200 aftershocks followed the main earthquake over the next couple of days
  • Cause (of Italy earthquake)
    • Italy is located along the plate boundary where the Africa plate meets the Eurasian plate
    • The two fault lines running through Italy are the North-South Fault and the East-West Fault.
  • Effects (of Italy earthquake)
    • Severe damage to buildings
    • 80% of buildings in Amatrice old town were affected
    • Over 50% of all buildings in Amatrice were damaged and destroyed
    • The school in Amatrice collapsed
    • 296 people died
    • Landslides blocked the roads 
    • Psychological effects on the population
    • Tourism was negatively affected
    • Farmers were affected as 90% of barns and stalls for livestock in the immediate area were destroyed
    • Amatrice hospital was badly damaged.
  • Immediate responses (of Italy earthquake)
    • Rescue workers sent to the worst hit areas with hours.
    • Soldiers, Red Cross, Firefighters, Rescue dogs and Helicopters.
    • Patients from Amatrice were transferred to nearby hospital in Rieti, with a temporary hospital set up for the injured.
    • Tents were supplied to 10,000 people
    • Shelters were provided in sports halls and community buildings.
    • Communication was restored, with emergency lines set up.
    • Residents were asked to remove Wi-Fi passwords for better communication.
    • Mobile kitchens served 1,000 meals daily, and extra blood donations arranged.
  • Long term responses (of Italy earthquake)
    • The Italian government promised relocate those made homeless into temporary accommodation within 6 months
    • €42 million initiative called 'Home Italy' which would rebuild homes in the same style as they had been before the earthquake
    • Fundraising by the community and Italian Red Cross 
    • Children attended classes in towns near to Amatrice to ensure they didn't miss education
    • A temporary school was built in Amatrice