Modern liberals believe that an individual's potential could be limited by circumstance and therefore help was necessary for self-realisation in developmental individualism.
John Locke: 'Men being, as has been said, by nature, all free, equal and independent, no one can be put out of this estate, and subjected to the political power of another, without his own consent'
Betty Friedan: 'The only way for a woman, as for a man, to find herself, to know herself as a person, is by creative work of her own. There is no other way'
For classical liberals, society is atomistic, meaning it is composed of self-seeking individuals pursuing their own interests, who require little more than freedom from restraint (negative freedom) to do this
Modern liberals promote a society in which individuals collaborate to achieve social justice so that the potential of all individuals can be developed (positive freedom)
According to John Locke, individuals enter a social contract with the state, but the people remain sovereign and individual rights take precedence over the state which only exists with their consent
Classical liberals believe that a limited state is the best way to facilitate individualism, as any intervention by the state will limit individual freedom and autonomy
At the heart of this disagreement between classical and modern liberals are the contrasting views on human nature, with classical liberals believing in egotistical individualism and modern liberals advocating developmental individualism