cognitive approach

Subdecks (1)

Cards (25)

  • overall assumptions of cognitive?
    • thoughts influence behaviour
    • focuses on internal processes of human mind - memory/perception/thinking
  • what is SLINCI?
    Schema
    Lab experiments
    Internal mental processes
    Neuroscience
    Computer models
    Inference
  • what is schema?
    • building block of knowledge about something that is built up through our own experiences
    • unique to the individual
    • as we get older schema increases as we have had more experiences so knowledge is greater
    • acts as framework of how to act in certain situations
    • helps us to know how to interpret info when there is gaps
  • why is schema useful?
    • helps us to predict what will happen in the world
    • helps us to prevent being overwhelmed by environmental stimuli
  • what can schemas lead to?
    • stereotypes
    • prejudice
  • our memory is?
    reconstructive
  • explain internal mental processes?
    • private operations of the mind
    • such as perception & attention
  • how does the cognitive app suggest we take in info?
    • input - process - output
  • how are internal mental processes studied?
    • indirectly
    • look at persons behaviour & make inferences about their internal processes that caused that behaviour
  • name 2 ways to study internal processes?
    1. theoretical model
    2. computer model
  • explain theoretical model?
    • make inferences by looking at behaviour & examining thought processes that happen in mind
    • usually in distinct steps - suggests that info flows in a sequence of stages in cognitive system
  • explain computer model?
    • mind is compared to a computer
    • suggests that there are similarities in the way that a person processes info to a way a computer does
  • explain neuroscience?
    • scientific way of studying brain structures/processes/chemistry that are responsible for mental processes
    • map brain areas to a specific cognitive function
  • 3 *?
    1. real life applications
    2. scientific
    3. clinical evidence to support from clive wearing
  • * real life applications
    • places emphasis on internal mental processes to explain depression - due to problems with negative & irrational thoughts
    • as a result has led to cognitive treatment of depression - rebt where it aims to change irrational thoughts to more rational ones
    • helped the developement of treatments for patients with a mental illness
    • so shows that it has practical applications for explaining certain behaviours in real world
  • * scientific?
    • objective, uses lab experiments so has high internal validity
    • evs are controlled so can establish cause & effect relationship between mental processes
    • internal
    • falisifiable & objective so it can be concluded that thoughts influence behaviour
  • * clinical evidence from clive wearing
    • damaged hippocampus & had difficulty transferring info from short term to long term memory
    • affected his cognitions & in turn his behaviour - supporting the use of cognitive neuroscience
    • shows there are specific parts of brain that have certain functions which determine human processes & behaviour showing thoughts influence behaviour
    • but case studies are hard to replicate & unique so reliability of this method to understand cog approach may be questioned
  • name 2 weaknesses?
    1. lacks ecological validity - unrealistic
    2. machine reductionist
  • X machine reductionist?
    • reduces something complex to something very simple that bieng our internal mental processes are same as computers
    • pro : allows us to research in detail so is likely to be scientific
    • con: ignores other factors that could affect human processes eg human emotion
    • if we dont consider other factors which influence human processes & control these vairables then we are not accurately measuring the effect of IV on DV
  • X unrealistic?
    • uses lab experiments so behaviour will be unnatural
    • also compares processes to computers which is not realistic as humans make errors & dont necessarily work in same process every time we do something
    • ecological
    • findings cannot be generalised to real life situations
    • also difficult to compare humans to computers as it neglects confounding variables which may also influence behaviour - personality