Any example of a piece of research that over or under represents men or women and because of the mis-representation, the results are skewed. The theory or results treat one gender less favourably than the other.
In his psychoanalytic approach, Freud argued that because girls don't suffer the same oedipal conflict as boys, they don't identify with mothers as strongly as boys identify with the fathers, and so develop weaker superegos
o It has lead to some theorists (Gilligan) to assert the worth and valuation of 'feminine qualities'
o Has led to healthy criticism of cultural values that praise certain 'male' qualities such as aggression and individualism as desirable, adaptive and universal
o focus on differences between genders leads to the similarity within genders, thus this ignores the many ways in which women are different from each other
o Fight or flight response research was often carried out on male animals because they have fewer variations in hormones than females. It was assumed that it would not be a problem as the fight or flight response is the same for everyone. Taylor et al (2000) have suggested that female biology has evolved to inhibit the fight of flight response, shifting attention towards tend and befriend rather than fight or flight.
o Kohlberg's theory of moral development is beta biased.
o It makes people see men and women as the same, which has led to equal treatment in legal terms and equal access for example, to education and employment
o Greater understanding of gender bias has put forward solutions - Cornwell et al 2013 noted that females are better at learning thus emphasising both the value and the attributes of women. As a result, this type of research helps to gender stereotypes, which is important in reducing gender bias
o Sexism within the research process - A lack of women at senior research levels means that female concerns may not be reflected in the research questions asked.
o the diagnostic system for depression might be biased towards finding depression in women, with the expectation that men should 'pull themselves together' on their own
• There has been such a beta bias resulting from sampling bias in favour of males in clinical trials of anti- psychotics. Only about 1/3 of participants in such trials have been female, a large under- representation. Moreover, only 15% of studies report the main results, i.e., on effectiveness, separately for males and females, and only half of these discussed the gender differences, so there is also a reporting bias.
• This means that we know a lot less than we should about how antipsychotics work, especially for females. For many medicines, differences in weight, hormones and health behaviours mean that a difference in dose is required. This may result in unnecessarily high doses being given to women. Women tend to react better to antipsychotics, so may need a lower dose.
• In Asch's experiment the measurement of conformity may have led to an alpha bias. The original task in Asch's experiment was judging line length and replications of Asch found that females were more conformist than males on this task, which led to much theorising on why such a difference existed. However, the task is one that, at least stereotypically, is seen as a 'male' task, involving a mathematical component.
• When variations of Asch (eventually) used tasks that were (again, at least stereotypically) 'female', e.g., fashion, they found that males were more conformist than females on such tasks.
• Evolutionary explanations of relationship preferences can be criticised for alpha bias on the grounds that they stress and exaggerate gender differences in relationship preferences, emphasising biological theories for differences instead of environmental explanations
• For example, in explaining the results from Clark & Hatfield's experiment on casual sex, evolutionary theorists argue that females avoid casual sex because of an evolved desire for a quality mate
• However, they ignore a number of alternative, environmental, explanations, e.g., that women are trying to minimise risk from attack or avoid being judged by sexist double standards.
• The idea that women are more naturally 'choosy' than men is socially sensitive: it could lead to guilt in or negative judgments of women who do enjoy casual sex
often presented as fixed + enduring when they arent
E) Maccoby + Jacklin presented findings of several gender studies which concluded girls have superior verbal ability + boys have better spatial ability - suggested differences are hardwired into brain so are seen as facts
E) possible date from Maccoby + Jacklin was popularised because it fitted existing stereotypes
L) suggests we should be wary of accepting research finding as biological facts when they might be better explained as social stereotypes
often presented as fixed + enduring when they arent
counterpoint
E) doesn't mean psychologists should avoid studying possible gender differences in brain as some suggests that the popular social stereotypes that women are better at multitasking may be biological
E) seems womans brain may benefit from better connections between right + left hemisphere than in a mans brain
L) suggests there may be biological differences but we still should be wary of exaggerating the effect they may have on behaviour
research challenging gender biases may not be published
E) Formanowicz analysed 1000 articles relating to gender bias + found research on gender bias is funded less often + published less by journals - fewer scholars become aware or apply it in their own work
E) researchers argued that this still held true when gender bias was compared with other forms of bias
L) suggests that gender bias in psychological research may not be taken as seriously as other forms of bias
Covers many types of bias. It can be used to refer to judgements and prejudices about certain cultures, or methodological biases which can lead to biased conclusions
It occurs when a norm or particular behaviour is only judged from the viewpoint of one culture and not universally because cultural differences cause the behaviour many times to be seen as different or abnormal.