A type of social influence where a person yields to group pressures and changes their behaviour or opinion as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person or group
Types of conformity (Kelman)
Internalisation
Identification
Compliance
Internalisation
Making the beliefs, values, attitude and behaviour of the group your own (the strongest type of conformity, often occurs as a result of informational social influence)
Identification
Temporary/short term change of behaviour and beliefs only in the presence of a group (middle level)
Compliance
Following other people's ideas/going along with the group to gain their approval or avoid disapproval (lowest/weakest level of conformity)
Informational social influence
When someone conforms because they want to be right, so they look to others by copying or obeying them, to have the right answer in a situation
Normative social influence
When someone conforms because they want to be liked and be part of a group; when a person's need to be accepted or have approval from a group drives compliance
NSI and ISI may not be completely exclusive, as suggested by Deutsch and Gerrard's 'Two Process Model'
It may be more beneficial to look at NSI and ISI as complementary, as opposed to mutually exclusive mechanisms
Asch's study
123 male American undergraduates in groups of 6; 1 true participant and 5 confederates
Participants and confederates were presented with 4 lines; 3 comparison lines and 1 standard line
Confederates would give the same incorrect answer for 12 out of 18 trials
Asch observed how often the participant would give the same incorrect answer as the confederates versus the correct answer
Factors affecting level of conformity
Size of majority/Group size
Unanimity of majority
Task difficulty
Size of majority/Group size
An individual is more likely to conform when in a larger group
Unanimity of majority
An individual is more likely to conform when the group is unanimous i.e. all give the same answer, as opposed to them all giving different answers
Task difficulty
An individual is more likely to conform when the task is difficult
Zimbardo's study
24 American male undergraduate students
Participants randomly assigned roles of guard or prisoner in a simulated prison
Behaviour of participants observed
Agentic state
When a person believes that someone else will take responsibility for their own actions
Agentic shift
When a person shifts from an autonomous state (where they believe they will take responsibility for their own actions) to an agentic state
Legitimacy of authority
How credible the figure of authority is - people are more likely to obey if the authority is seen as credible, morally good/right, and legitimate
Expert authority
When the authority figure is seen as credible and knowledgeable, like a scientist
Agentic state
When people believe they are acting on behalf of an authority figure, rather than taking personal responsibility for their actions
Legitimacy of authority
How credible the figure of authority is, in terms of being morally good/right, and legally based or law abiding
Students are more likely to listen to their parents or teachers than other unknown adults
Expert authority
When the authority figure is seen as legitimate because they are a knowledgeable and responsible expert, like a scientist
Proximity
Participants obeyed more when the experimenter was in the same room (62.5%) compared to being in a different room (20.5%)
Location
Participants obeyed more when the study was conducted at a prestigious university, as it demanded obedience and increased trust in the researchers
Uniform
Participants obeyed more when the experimenter wore a lab coat, as it gave them higher status and greater sense of legitimacy
Authoritarian personality
Belief that people should completely obey or submit to their authority figures, and suppress their own beliefs
scale
A scale used to measure the authoritarian personality, requiring participants to rate their agreement with certain statements
Reaction formation
When a child with overly harsh and disciplinarian parents displaces their anger onto seemingly 'inferior' others
Adorno's psychodynamic theory
A person's personality traits and attitudes as an adult stemmed from childhood influences such as that of one's parents
Scapegoating
Child with overly harsh and disciplinarian parents displaces their anger with their parents onto seemingly 'inferior' others
On a surface level, the child would idolise their parents, but on an unconscious level, they would fear and despise them, and so arises the need to displace such anger
The child would be more likely to target their displaced anger on those who seem weak and unable to defend themselves, such as minority groups
Reaction formation
The process where the child displaces their anger onto seemingly 'inferior' others
Reaction formation is often seen in current politics
There are serious methodological issues associated with the F-scale, as suggested by Greenstein
Acquiescence bias
The phenomenon of respondents always responding in the same way using the scales provided, regardless of the content shown in the scales
The findings produced by the F-scale may be lacking in validity and reliability due to acquiescence bias
The Authoritarian Personality may not be able to explain all cases of obedience across the whole political spectrum, according to Christie and Jahoda
Left-wing authoritarianism is also present, such as Bolshevism, and has been ignored by the current theory