There is evidence that research that challenges gender bias is less likely to be published. For example, Formanowicz et al. (2018) found that research in this area is poorly funded. It also tends to be published in less prestigious journals. They also found that research that challenges other forms of bias, such as culture bias, is more likely to be published than research that challenges gender bias. This suggests that gender bias in psychologicalresearch may not be taken as seriously as other forms of bias.
There is evidence that research often presents differences between the genders as fixed and inevitable
However, in an age of increased media globalization it has been argued that the individualist-collectivist distinction no longer applies. For example, Takano & Osaka (1999) found that 14 out of 15 studies that compared America (an individualistic culture) with Japan (a collectivistic culture) found no evidence of the traditional distinction between individualism and collectivism. They described the distinction as lazy and simplistic. This could perhaps suggest that cultural bias in psychological research is less of an issue than it once was.
Cultural bias in psychological research has led to prejudice and discrimination against certain cultural groups
They were deemed as 'mentally unfit' and 'feeble minded' in comparison to the white majority and were deniededucational and professional opportunities as a result
One strength of the idiographic approach, with its in-depth qualitative methods of investigation, is that it provides a complete and detailed account of the individual. This may complement the nomothetic approach by shedding further light on general laws, or may challenge these general laws. Also, an individual case may generate hypotheses for further study. This the case for the idiographic approach.
One strength of the nomothetic approach is that the research methods that it uses tend to be more scientific, mirroring those used in the natural sciences. Hypotheses are formulated, tested under controlled conditions and findings generated are analysed for their statistical significance. Such processes have enabled psychologists to establish norms of behaviour, which arguably gives the discipline of psychology more scientific credibility.
A criticism made of the idiographic approach is that it is not scientific. For example, conclusions made from case studies often rely on the subjective interpretation of the researcher. Also, one of the criticisms levelled at Freud is that many of his concepts, such as the Oedipus complex, were largely developed from the study of a single case. Meaningful generalisations therefore cannot be made. This is the case against the idiographic approach.
One weakness of the nomothetic approach is that it has been accused of ‘losing the whole person’ within psychology. For example, knowing that there is a 1% risk of developing schizophrenia tells us very little about what life is like with the disorder. Similarly, in laboratory experiments, participants are treated as a series of scores rather than individuals. Their subjective experience of the situation is ignored. This means that, in its search for generalities, the nomothetic approach may sometimes overlook the richness of human experience.
It has been pointed out that the government relying on socially sensitive research to shape public policy is in fact a good thing. It is preferable for the government to look to scientific research when developing policies on important issues such as childcare and crime. The alternative would be the government relying solely on political opinion. This suggests that psychologists have an important role to play in providing high quality scientific research on socially sensitive topics.
Socially sensitive research
Research that deals with topics that are sociallysensitive or controversial