Types of data

    Cards (15)

    • Primary data
      • Data collected from first-hand experience
      • For testing specific hypotheses
      • Design study -> get approval -> carry out study -> analyse findings -> draw conclusions
      • Any experiment carried out by researcher = primary data
    • Primary data strengths:
      • Close focus = more control over data -> fits aims + hypotheses better
      • Investigator bias can be avoided because researcher builds study around hypothesis
    • Primary data weaknesses:
      • Close focus = time consuming = expensive + difficult to obtain/analyse
      • Designing study = time consuming
      • Researcher close to study = potential investigator bias
    • Secondary data
      • Data collected for another purpose in different form/collected by different researcher for same purpose
      • e.g. government statistics
    • Secondary data strengths:
      • Readily available = easy to access
      • Cheaper + more time efficient
      • Data may have been statistically tested to support accuracy/reliability
    • Secondary data weaknesses:
      • Potential investigator bias unavoidable as someone else conducted the research
      • Original researchers may not have taken the same care in preventing investigator bias
      • Research built around specific hypothesis = may not fit around new hypothesis
    • Meta-analysis
      • Primary data from other studies combined + re-analysed -> draws on as many prior studies as possible to base conclusions off of regarding new hypothesis
      • Produces quantitative data
    • Meta-analysis strengths:
      • Makes it easy to identify trends in research that are not always easy to point out
      • Time efficient = inexpensive (data is readily available)
      • Huge sample size
    • Meta-analysis weaknesses:
      • Primary research has to be of good quality as chosen secondary data relies on it
      • Doesn't take into account potential investigator bias
    • Quantitative data

      • Numerical data obtained from counting variables
      • Experimental + observational methods can provide quantitative data
    • Quantitative data strengths:
      • Variables operationalised well = objective + reliable data
      • Can be put into graphs to spot trends (can be used in meta-analysis)
      • Data obtained easier to replicate
    • Quantitative data weaknesses:
      • Doesn't give origin of original data
      • Trends' contexts not explained
      • Superficial insight
    • Qualitative data
      • Non-numerical data (detailed)
      • Obtained from subjective studies, e.g. self-report methods, case studies
      • Insight into meaning behind quantitative data
    • Qualitative data strengths:
      • Provides origins of data, e.g. motivation + intent
      • Richer insight into data itself
    • Qualitative data weaknesses:
      • Subjective -> can't see patterns in data
      • Not replicable = can't be generalised