Educational social policy refers to the plans and strategies for education introduced by the government
1870 Forster act
this enabled for all children aged between 5-10 to receive free, state education
there was an emphasis on punctuality, obedience and hard work
Education Reform Act
1988
introduced by New Right (conservative)
New Right aimed to get rid of welfare dependancy and state control.
Margaret Thatcher
Tripartite school system
1944 Education Act
Consisted of grammar schools, secondary modern and technical schools
Its aims were to promote meritocracy
11+ exam used to determine what school a pupil went to
more bipartite as there were few technical schools
Pros of Tripartite system
In theory students were able to have an education that best met their ability
removed some class barriers - grammar schools were now accessible t o w-class students
cons of a tripartite system
reproduces class inequality by channeling two social classes into two types of schools offering unequal opportunities
reproducing gender inequality by requiring girls to gain higher marks on the 11+
legitimises inequality through the ideology that ability is inborn
m-class students are given more support and encouragement
Comprehensive school system
1965
aimed to overcome the class divide brought about by the tripartite system and actually make education meritocratic
11+ abolished and catchment areas determined the school apupil went to
pros of comprehensive system
helped to encourage social cohesion
they don't base admissions on academic or social factors
cons of comprehensive system
high achieving students can be held back by lower achieving students
m-class students are more advantaged
perspectives on tripartite system
marxists would say it removes some class barriers, but there are other factors that would have a negative impact on w-class pupils causing them to perform worse
functionalists would say the system is good as it promotes meritocracy within education
perspectives on comprehensive system
functionalists like this system as it promotes social integration and cohesion by bringing the classes together
however Julienne Ford (1969) found little mixing between the classes
more meritocratic as pupils given more time to develop their abilities
marxists would say it is not meritocratic
reproduces class inequality by not giving w-class children an equal opportunity
myth of meritocracy - legitimises class inequality
marketisation
1988 education reform act
this is the process of schools being run like businesses through creating competition between schools and give parents more choice (parentocracy - Miriam David)
this would mean less control of the state
the aim of this is to raise standards and encourage diversity in schools
policies of marketisation - impact on parents choice
school league tables based on exam results - parents can navigate what schools are the best and worst
higher tuition fees for uni - parents know that the investment will go back into improving the uni
funding formula - parents will take their children to schools with many pupils
nationalcurriculum
the A-C economy
this is an educational triage that shows the successfulness of students at getting the grades A-C > determines their place on league tables
those who will pass
borderline C/D students
hopeless cases
Gerwitz - 3 kinds of parents
privileged-skilled choosers - m/class parents who have more cultural capital
disconnected local choosers - w/class who were restricted from economic and cultural capital
semi-skilled choosers - w/class are ambitious for their child, want them to do well, rely on opinions from others
New Labour Policies
1997-2010
Tony Blair aimed to reduce inequalities, promote greater diversity and choice
Education needed to move into the 'post-comprehensive' era - the one size fits all approach should be scrapped
examples of NL policies
Aim higher programme - aimed to raise the aspirations of groups who under-represented in higher education
Educational Maintenance Allowance - payments given to students from low-income backgrounds to stay in education after 16 -£50
Designated some area as Education Action zones - schools in deprived areas given more resources and money
National Literacy Strategy - literacy and numeracy hours, and reducing primary school class sizes
Academies - a new type of school started to help struggling schools - gov provides the money
Evaluation of NL policies
EMA scrapped by 2010 coalition as students did not use money for education
New Labour paradox - although they aimed to reduce inequality but they introduced tuition fees and the attainment gap has remained high between w/class and m/class
Benn - contradictory as reduces inequality and introduced tuition fees
Coalition government from 2010
conservative-lib/dem were inspired by new right ideas
increased tuition fees to £9000 a year
introduced pupil premium and free school meals
schools are forced to be a academies when OFSTED report is 'satisfactory' or below
Free schools
coalition gov.
gives anyone the opportunity to create a school if they are unhappy with the local schools available
funded directly by the gov
gives parents choice
Evaluation of Coalition
Ball - academies caused fragmentation and centralisation of control
privatisation
2010
this the transfer of public assets to private companies
this is how education becomes a source of profit Ball(2007) calls this eduaction services industres (ESI)
PPP are an example of ESI and are usually involved in building and designing schools, as well as supply teachers