Connection and meanings of the words and symbols is not inherently logical and necessary
There’s nothing inherently dog-like with the word dog. It was just learned and accepted within a linguistic society
Behaviorism
Language is a system of habits
Learned by repetition and reinforcement
Behaviorism
Focuses on observable behaviors and environmental factors that shape linguistic developments
Cognitivism
Language is a rule-governed behavior
Not simply a learned response of a stimuli
Involves an internalization of rules
There are underlying rules governing the arrangement and combination of elements
Cognitivism
The speaker-hearer has internalized the rules of the language
Perception, memory, and reasoning
Highlighting importance of mental processes: memory, attention, and problem solving
Cognitivism
Cognitive science
role of mental processes, such as memory, attention, problem-solving, and comprehension, in language learning and use
There is a universal grammar- universals in language. At a highly abstract level, all languages must share key characteristics
Universal grammar - Noam Chomsky
Acquiring language is innate to human
There is a universal set of grammatical principles that underlie all human languages
Universal grammar:
Humans are born with an inherent ability to grasp these deep structures, enabling them to acquire language to which they are exposed.
Nativism
Language is an innate or inborn capacity of man.
Man has a LAD (Language Acquisition Device; Chomsky 1965)
Language Acquisition Device
In contrast to theories that emphasize environmental influences or learning mechanisms
Suggests that certain aspects of language are hard-wired into the human brain
Humans are born with an inherent ability to acquire language - not a learned behavior
LAD- proposal
System design for acquisition of language
Allows humans to effortlessly and rapidly acquire the complex rules and structures
Nativism
Language is species-specific
Unique characteristic of human species
Other animals may communicate in other ways
Defining feature of being human
Mutual Intelligibility
We know that they speak different language when we don’t understand them
Design Features of Language (Stewart and Vaillette 2001)
Pantao ang communication systems kapag may design features
Is language only human?
Human language contains these design features
What often lacks in animal system
MSPCIADDP
Mode of communication
Vocal auditory - human and animal systems
Visual - apes - signals
Tactiles - bees
Chemicals - moths?
Semantic function
Signals carry meaning
Pragmatic function
Practical purpose
Survival
Influencing behaviors
Cultural transmission
Necessity for some aspects of communication systems to be acquired through communicative interactions w/ other users of the system - human language
A child raised by Russian parents can learn English if they are exposed to it
Other species have innate or genetically programmed signal code → instinctive
Bird songs
Chimpanzee signals
Interchangeability
One can speak your language as long as u have the same language as them
Ability to send and receive messages
Can both convey messages through speech
Arbitrariness
Signals not logically connected to their meaning
Animal systems do not have this
Discreteness
Constructing smaller messages to smaller distinct parts
Animal communication systems lack this property
Phonemes → morphemes → words → phrases → words → sentence → text
Displacement
We can talk about things that are not present in immediate space or time
Past and future
Unicorn
Lasa ng matcha na wala naman rn pero alam mo yung lasa ng matcha sa cafe sa labas
Delulu lang ganon
Lacks in animal system
Productivity
Can produce an output
Creativity & open-endedness
Create & comprehend endless variety of expressions
Infinite variety of messages
Bow-wow theory (Jespersen 1922)
Traced back to imitations of natural sounds
Sounds of natural occurrences
Dogs barking, birds chirping
Pooh-pooh theory (Jespersen 1922)
Spontaneous exclamations and interjections
Emotional expressions or exclamatory sounds as humans’ response to their environment
Gradually evolved
Yo-he-ho theory
Collective rhythmic activity
Communal work
Repetitive sounds produced during group activities
Rhythmic chants
Coordinating efforts
Spontaneous emotional expressions
The Oral-Gesture Source
This theory involves a link between physical gesture and orally produced sounds
Link to simultaneous use of physical gestures and oral sounds
Early stages of language development communication evolve
Use of spoken sounds and physical gestures
Oral component may have gained complexity → development of a more sophisticated spoken language
Early human communication is a combination of vocalizations and accompanying physical gestures
Oral and gestural
Dual nature of language:
Interactional function: how humans use language to interact with each other, socially or emotionally; how they indicate friendliness, co-operation or hostility, or annoyance, pain, or pleasure
Feelings
Establishment and maintenance of social relationships
Dual nature of language:
Transactional function: humans use their linguistic abilities to communicate knowledge, skills, and information
Task-oriented
Practical information
Conveying content
Educational settings
Language as a left-hemisphere function
The condition marked by severe language dysfunction is termed aphasia.
“We speak with the left hemisphere.” (Broca 1861, quoted in Hoff 2014)
Spoken or signed
right -hemisphere- processing visual spatial information
Language is a left-hemisphere function comes from individuals with a severed corpus callosum
Right-hemisphere Contributions to Language
Right-hemisphere-lesion patients sometimes produce abnormal intonation contour when they speak, and they may have difficulty recognizing the emotional tone of an utterance
The Critical Period Hypothesis (Hoff 2014)
The notion that a biologically determined period exists during which language acquisition must occur, if it is to occur at all
The critical period hypothesis with respect to language acquisition was originally proposed by Lenneberg (1967), who described language acquisition as an “age-limited potential” (p.175) with the relevant age being puberty
The Genetics of Language Impairment
KE Family
It appears that the KE family has a mutation that affects the encoding of a particular protein known as FOXP2
The unrelated individuals have different genetic stories, but in all cases, the same gene is involved (Fisher, 2006; Tomblin et al,. 2009)
The FOXP2 protein affects the formation of neural structures that are important for speech and language
Design Features of Language
Interchangeability
Kung kakausap si Washoe ng chimpanzee na hindi alam ang ASL, keri ni Washoe pero yung chimpanzee naur
Displacement
They have no capability to think of other things that don’t exist
Cultural Transmission
No same level of cognitive abilities to pass down language from generations to generations
Productivity
Animals have the capability to make sounds and produce words with help and guidance, it is still more likely to be heavily reliant to their instructors
90% of Nim’s utterances were dependent to her teacher’s teachings