How others – groups and individuals – can influence our behaviour
We often believe that we are responsible for our own actions and make our own decisions, but a lot of the time other people can impact and influence us
It is very important to understand how others impact our behaviour, because then we can encourage good behaviour and prevent bad behaviour such as rioting and bullying
Social psychology
Helps us to understand ourselves better in our social world
Bystander intervention
When we help others in need
Bystander effect/apathy
When we fail to help someone in need
Bystander behaviour was investigated following the case of Kitty Genovese's murder in New York in 1964
Factors affecting whether we help or not
Situational factors
Personality factors
Diffusion of responsibility
We feel less personally responsible when there are more people around to potentially help
Noticing the event
We are less likely to notice events in a large crowd compared to when we are on our own
Pluralistic ignorance
When in situations, we often look to others and react based on what other people are doing
Cost of helping
The higher the costs, the less likely we are to help
Competence
If we feel competent (able) enough then we will help
Mood
We are more likely to help if we are in a good mood than in a bad mood
Similarity
The more we see ourselves as similar to a victim then the more likely we are to help them
Psychological research indicates that although some personality factors can influence whether or not we help, bystander intervention is largely influenced by situational factors
Piliavin et al (1969): Good Samaritanism: An Underground Phenomenon?
1. Aim: to investigate helping behaviour in a natural environment, and understand the conditions in which people are more likely to help
2. Procedure: New York Subway (field experiment), Approx 4500 passengers, Between 11am and 3pm, 4 groups of 4 students used, Covert observation
The Railway Carriage set-up
piliavin carriage
81 out of 103 trials, the victim was helped before the model planned to help
In 60% of the trials, more than one person helped
90% of first helpers were male
64% of first helpers were white
68% of helpers who aided the white victim were also white
50% of white passengers came to the aid of a black victim
There was a tendency for same race helping if the victim appeared drunk
Interestingly, no diffusion of responsibility was found. The speed in which people helped was greater when there was more people than when there was less
Conformity
The tendency to change what we do, think or say in response to the influence of real or imagined pressure from others
Normative Social Influence
We wish to be liked by the majority group, so we go along with them even though we may not agree with them
Informational Social Influence
We look to the majority group for information as we are unsure about the way in which to behave
Deindividuation
Loss of personal self-awareness and responsibility as a result of being part of a group
Factors affecting conformity
Locus of Control
Age
Adolescents are more likely to conform than older people
Factors increasing conformity
Bigger group
Everyone agrees
Task is easy
Obedience
Following orders from a higher authority
Blind Obedience
Following orders of an authority figure without question
2. Variations of Milgram's study: Proximity, Change of location, Uniform
Authoritarian personality
Someone with an authoritarian personality type is more likely to obey
Agentic State
Individuals are either in an agentic state or an autonomous state. Someone in an agentic state believes they are acting on behalf of someone else and so are more likely to obey
Crowd Behaviour
A large group of individuals behaving collectively (a mob mentality)