If there are no people to be affected, then it is not a hazard, simply an event that happened
Why do people knowingly put themselves at risk by living near hazards
They simply don't want to leave
They may believe the defenses will protect them
They just don't believe that the hazard is going to occur
It could be to do with the economy (jobs, facilities)
There are lots of social reasons (don't know where to go, language barriers)
Human activity has a big impact on climate change, as humans are responsible for the majority of the CO2 that is put into the atmosphere
This increasing climate change is leading to more flooding and more extreme weather events
If a densely populated area is affected, then more people are going to be affected
Tectonic plates
Parts of the crust of the Earth, the surface that we are actually on, which is a very thin surface in comparison with the thicknesses of the different layers in the Earth
Mantle
A very thick layer below the crust, full of magma, molten rock that is flowing very slowly
Core
The innermost layer of the Earth, which is very hot
The heat of the core underneath the molten rock sets up convection currents in the magma
Plates collide and crumble up to form mountains, frequent earthquakes but no volcanoes
Destructive continental-oceanic plate margin
Oceanic plate subducted below continental plate, magma forms volcanoes, friction causes earthquakes
Conservative plate margin
Plates move against each other, friction causes earthquakes but no volcanoes
Constructive plate margin
Plates move away from each other, magma reaches surface and forms new rocks, can lead to rift valleys and shield volcanoes
Primary effects
The first effect of a natural hazard or event on the population, that is the people or the buildings
Secondary effects
The after effects of a natural hazard or event, happening over a longer time scale (days, weeks, months, or even years)
Immediate response
How people react straightaway, as the event is happening and the immediate time scale afterwards
Long term response
How people will react to the natural hazard in the weeks or the months after it has happened
HIC
High income country, defined by the World Bank as a country where the Gross National Income (GNI) is over $12,000 per person
LIC
Low income country, defined by the World Bank as a country where the Gross National Income (GNI) is less than $12,000 per person
HIC earthquake case studies
Chile (8.8 Richter scale, $30 billion cost)
Italy (6.3 Richter scale, $11 billion cost)
Primary effects of Chile earthquake
Airport and port severely damaged, loss of power affecting communications and water supply, 500 killed, 12,000 injured, many homes and schools destroyed
Primary effects of Italy earthquake
Nearly 15,000 old buildings collapsed, including university, hospital and churches, 300 killed, 1,500 injured
Secondary effects of Chile earthquake
Tsunamis, landslides, and fires, roads damaged and blocked hampering aid delivery
Secondary effects of Italy earthquake
Increase in rent and house prices, less businesses in the area
Immediate response in Chile
National funding appeals, local and international emergency services, repairs began immediately
Immediate response in Italy
Search for survivors began within an hour, hotels and tents provided, bill payments suspended
Long term response in Chile
Government helped rebuild homes and businesses
Long term response in Italy
Reduced taxes for affected people
LIC earthquake case study
Nepal (7.9 Richter scale, $5 billion cost)
Primary effects of Nepal earthquake
Supply of food, water and electricity badly affected, 9,000 killed, 1,700 injured, 1 million made homeless
Secondary effects of Nepal earthquake
Avalanche on Everest killed 19, landslides blocked roads, loss of tourism and seed for planting
Immediate response in Nepal
Aid and supplies pledged from other countries, tents provided for displaced people, helicopters used to deliver aid due to blocked roads
Long term response in Nepal
Massive rebuilding project, repairs to Everest base camp to restart tourism
It is very difficult to protect against a volcanic explosion
Predicting volcanic eruptions
Easier than predicting earthquakes, advanced warning from monitoring systems (temperature, gases, gravity, satellite data)
Protecting against earthquakes
Map affected areas, locate important buildings away from hazards, secure furniture, educate population, stockpile supplies, earthquake drills
New technology has meant we now know more about how to protect against earthquakes and reduce the risk