1. Each direction of movement on the robot is considered an axis of movement
2. Single movement axis is equal to one degree of freedom
Robot
Rotates at the waist
Bends forward and back at the shoulder
Moves vertically at the elbow
Degrees of freedom
This particular robot is equal to six degrees of freedom
Degrees of freedom
1. Moves along one axis for each of the waist, shoulder and elbow joints
2. Moves along three axes at the wrist using pitch, roll and yaw
Position axes
Help to locate the tool in the work area
Most robots have at least three position axes to help position the tool in the work area
If the robot were to slide along a track it would have a fourth position axis of linear movement and another degree of freedom
Orientation axes
Help orient the tool in relation to the workpiece
Types of movement along orientation axes
Pitch
Roll
Yaw
Orientation axes movement
Pitch moves the tool vertically
Roll rotates the tool about its center axis
Yaw turns the tool left and right
The position axes movement at the waist, shoulder and elbow along with the orientation axes movement of pitch, roll and yaw allow the robot to accomplish its tasks within the work envelope
Today's webinar is on hazard analysis and risk assessments of collaborative robots
The webinar will show the analysis of various hazards and ways to mitigate risk relevant to ISO 15066, which is a supplement and support to ISO 10218 for industrial robot safety standards, and is more geared towards collaborative robots
The webinar will provide an overview of the HAZOP (Hazard and Operability) analysis and how it helps organize and identify risks associated with collaborative robot systems
Hazard
A potential source of physical injury or damage to health, property, or the environment
Operator motion and location with respect to parts
Fixture design
Manually controlled robot guiding devices
Surrounding environment
Application-related hazards
Process-specific hazards
Limits caused by personal protective equipment
Ergonomic design
Task identification
1. Identify additional hazards from specific tasks performed by the operator
2. Consider fluency and duration of robot-operator collaboration
3. Frequency and duration of contact
4. Transitions between non-collaborative and collaborative operation
5. Automatic or manual restart
6. Tasks involving more than one operator
7. Human error
Quasi-static contact
Operator body part pushed against a fixed surface by the robot, where the operator cannot move away for more than 0.5 seconds
Transient contact
Robot arm hitting the operator in free space, where the operator can immediately get away from the hazard
Quasi-static contact has a lower tolerable pain threshold compared to transient contact
Power and force limiting
1. Limit power and force through control or design, considering intended contact, incidental contact, and failure modes leading to contact
2. Use force limiting, automatic shutoff after contact, and enhanced operator training to mitigate risks
3. Implement mechanical integrity programs and review controller code to avoid failure modes leading to contact
Ant damage
Can have automatic shutoff after contact
A lot of robots are going to be designed so that it'll immediately detect when it hits a body part or just another object and the robots going to immediately shut down
Operator training procedures
Can enhance to hopefully avoid human error as much as possible
Failure modes leading to contact situations
Mechanical or controller error resulting in contact with the operator
Avoiding failure modes leading to contact
1. Mechanical integrity program
2. Review controller code
3. Procedures to keep operator in area only during dedicated collaborative work phase
Potential contact events
Eliminate possibility for operator being struck in head or face area
Consider biomechanical limits and tolerance of different body parts
Origin of contact events
Probability or frequency of occurrence
Quasi-static or transient contact
Contact area, speeds, forces, pressures, momentum
Steps to achieving robot risk reduction
1. Identify conditions in which contact could occur
2. Evaluate risk potential for such contact events
3. Design robot and collaborative workspace so contact is infrequent and avoidable
Increase contact surface area with routed edges, smooth surfaces, compliant surfaces
Absorb energy, extend energy transfer time, reduce impact forces
Formal components and compliant joints/links
Limit moving masses
Active risk reduction
Addresses controller design of robot system
Active risk reduction measures
Force limiting
Velocity limiting
Eliminate momentum, mechanical power, energy
Sensing to anticipate and detect contact
Safety rated soft axis and space limiting function
Safety monitored stop function
Biomechanical limits criteria
Based on pain sensitivity of each body part, with different tolerances for quasi-static and transient contact
Biomechanical limits are based on conservative estimates and scientific research of pain sensation
Excelencia PHA tool
Used to perform hazard analysis and risk assessments, creating an organized list of hazards, likelihoods, consequences, safeguards, and recommendations