2004 indian ocean tsunami case study

Cards (31)

  • happened December 26th 2004
  • tsnunami waves were as high as 30m
  • killed over 240,000 people , 14 different countries
  • magnitude 9.1 earthquake
  • tsunami travelled as far as 3,000 miles to Africa , arrived with enough force to kill people and destroy property
  • caused by the indo-australian plate pushing north , diving under the Eurasian plate , where the ocean flood here is under plate pressure
  • earthquake , 9.3 magnitude ruptured ocean floor 240km north-west of Sumatra , indonesia
  • countries affected were kenya , somalia , india , sri lanka
  • 8,700 dead in Thailand
  • 16,000 died in India , 376,000 were made homeless
  • 37,000 died in Sri Lanka , 1 million+ made homeless
  • 310 died in Somalia , 40,000 made homeless
  • tsunami caused over 230,000 deaths
  • fresh water was contaminated by sewage and salt water
  • 650,000 people were injured
  • rice , mango and banana plantations were planted
  • mangrove forests along coastline were destroyed
  • 60% of Sri Lanka's fishing fleet was destroyed
  • 5-6 million people needed emergency aid such as food and water
  • oil industry lost eight million litres of oil
  • impacts so severe because:
    • lack of warnings
    • many places had unprotected coasts
    • floodwaters so strong people couldn't run away
  • a thick layer of debris accumulated on top of water m made it harder for people to be seen
  • short term response: more than 160 aid organisations and UN agencies came together and gave massive aid efforts
  • short term response: foreign military troops provided assistance, Australian Air Force improved air traffic control at Bando Aceh airport In Indonesia
  • long term response : education awareness on tsunamis began in school
  • long term responses : larger-scale programmes of reconstruction implemented , still thousands left in tents one year on
  • long term response : practice drills and evacuation plans established
  • long term response : coastal zones hazard-mapped to identify areas most at risk
  • long term response : existing government prejudices highlighted , Indian underclass , Dalits , ignored by government
  • long term response : tourist resorts quickly rebuilt like Phuket in Thailand , some coastal communities such as Andhra Pradesh in India were forced out by new developments
  • long term response : political barriers slowed aid distribution , Sri Lanka aid delayed to areas held by rebel Tamil Tigers