Dishonestappropriation of propertybelonging to another with the intention to permanentlydeprive
Theft (S.1)
Appropriation (s. 3)
Property (s.4)
Belonging to another (3.5)
Dishonesty (s. 2)
Intent to deprive (s. 6)
Appropriation
- 'assuming the rights of the owner'
S.(3)2.Includeskeepingproperty,dealing with itasanowner, even if it camebythatpropertyhonestly
Case - R v Morris (appropriation)
Guilty of theft as he swappedstorelabels which is assuming the rights of theowner
Property
Money and all other property,real or personal, including things in actions and all other intangible property. Notproperty 1. emptyland, wild flowers(not for sale), wildcreatures( unless owned)
Case - Oxford v Moss (property)
Moss obtained a copy of answers of an upcoming test, but confidentialinformation could not amount to intangibleproperty
Belonging to another
If you're given money for a specific reason and don't do what you're asked
If you're givenmoney by mistake, you are still stealing (excludes bookies giving money out by mistake)
Case - Turner (1971) (belonging to another)
Guilty, although A had ownership,PBAunder s s the garagehadpossession and control of it
Dishonesty
If he appropriates the property in the belief that he is given the right to deprive the other of it
If he appropriatesproperty in belief that the other would consent
If he appropriatesproperty and believes that the owner has already lost or abandoned it
Case - Barton and Booth (2020) (dishonesty)
This case established a 2parttest: 1. Taking into accountD'sknowledge and belief 2. WouldtheORP see D'sactions as Dishonest
Intent to deprive
Ddeprives the V of the itemforever
Money - D doesn'treturnexactnotes and coins
If borrowed - returned wholly diminished
Case - Lloyd (1985) (intent to deprive)
Notguilty of theft as property was notwhollydiminished
Robbery
Governed under s.8 of the Theft Act 1968
D is guilty of robbery if he steals, and immediately before or at the time of doing so, and in order to do so, use force on any person or seems to put any person in fear of being subjected to force
5 areas of robbery
Theft
Force
Timing
Purpose
Mens Rea
Theft
All 5 criteria of theft must be completed
Corcoran v Anderton
Guilty of robbery, appropriation had taken place-grabbing
Force
D must have used force or threatened force, force must be enough to modify V's movement, force/threat can be against anyone
R v Jones
Force is the ordinary word, so jury was entitled to find that force had been used
Timing
The force must be immediately before or at the time of the theft, theft is classed to be continuing whilst D is still in the building
R v Hale
Theft is a continuing act that was still when she was tied up