Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being under the kings peace , with malice aforethought, express or implied
Unlawful killing
It wasn’t a lawful killing such as it occurred through an act of self defence. The killing can be through an act or omission
Unlawful killing case
Gibbins and Proctor - dad and step mother starved 7 year old Nelly to death. LBO for murder
Human being
Foetus, life suppourt
Under the kings peace
Not at war
Under the kings peace case
Adebolajo - sentenced to prison convicted of murder, courts look at v’s situation rather than D’s mind
areas of murder
Actus reus( unlawful killing, human being, under the kings peace). Causation( legal and factual). Men’s rea( direct intent, oblique intent)
Direct intent
Adebolajo
Direct intent for GBH
Desires serious harm but for GBH - desires V dies
Oblique
Indirect intent to cause harm - desires a certain outcome but an unintended death occurs instead
Direct intent to kill
Desires the outcome and desires the death to occur
oblique intent to kill example
D plants a bomb trying to kill a desired victim on a plane but ends up killing everyone else
Oblique intent for GBH
Desires to cause GBH but a different outcome occurs such as death
Cases for Oblique intent
1. Woolin-□ threw baby towards pram, missed and baby dies
2. Death or serious harm was a virtual certainty
3. Knew it was a virtual certainty
Voluntary Manslaughter
If the defendant is charged with murder, partial defences are available to reduce the charge
Diminishedresponsibility
is under S.2 of the homicideact1957 but has now been amendedbyS52 of the coronersandjusticeact2009
Abnormality of mentalfunctioning 1. DR
D's functioning was so different from the ORP the reasonable man would deem it abnormal. Case ( byrne, he was unable to control his perverted desires, successfully claimed dr as he had a AMF)
Recognised medical condition 2. DR
Any condition recognised by the WHO, cases Brown ( D was found guilty of manslaughter on grounds of diminishes responsibility) Ahluwalia( D was found guilty of murder but on appeal it was reduced to manslaughter on grounds of dr)
Substantially impaired 3. DR
The RMC must substantially impair D's mental responsibility to do one of three gateways
Three gateways
Understand the nature and conduct of their actions
Make a rational judgement
Exercise self-control
Provides an explanation HA 1957
Means there must be a casual link between the defendants mental abnormality
Just drunk
Not a defence of DR
Drunk & an AMF/RMC
Alcohol Dependency (ADS) is a recognised medical condition
Dietschmann (2003): 'If D is drunk at the tive jury are to remove the intoxication and look of the RMC alone, Adjustment disorder.'
Stewart (2009): 'D Was a chronic alcholic Milled - ma during a fish. Appodea got ApS'
Drunk and an amf/rmc
Take out the alcohol and see if the d would do the same in the situation
loss of control
Partial defence to murder Under s.54 and s.55 Coroners and Justice Act 2009
Loss of self control
Loss of ability to act in accordance with formal powers of reasoning
Jewell (2014) case for lose of control
Defence failed as it was premeditated, therefore acting within normal powers of reasoning
Qualifying triggers
Fear
Anger-things said and done
Fear
D most fear serious violence from V against themselves or another
Anger
things said and done
Circumstances must be
extremely grace character and caused d to have a justified sense of being seriously wronged
Character
Must have a justified sense of being seriously wronged
Normal person test
A person of D's sex and age, with a normal degree of tolerance and self-restraint. case ( complin)
Involuntary manslaughter, UAM
4 areas to prove, unlawful act, dangerous, caused death, intention for the unlawful act
4 areas to prove
Unlawful Act
Omissions do not count, can be aimed at a person or property
Manslaughter
Case (Larkin)
G of unlawful act assault was more than simple threat
Cases, Church
G of UAM when he assaulted the V, due to her tounting him