Creating a theory and using it to explain actual behaviour
Behavioural economics
Observing actual behaviour and then coming up with the theory
Assumptions of traditional economic theory
Homo economicus or 'economic man' is self-interested and only care about himself
People know the consequences of everything they do
People are rational
People know what they want and always act on these preferences
Assumptions of behavioural economics
People are altruistic (they have some concerns for the wellbeing of others)
People are generally impatient and lack self-control
People dislike change 'status quo bias' unless the incentive to change is compelling
People make decisions using rule of thumb called heuristics
The role of emotions in decision making
Limitations to compute and reason
Bounded rationality
Imperfect information on possible alternatives and their consequences, limited mental processing ability, and a time constraint
Bounded self-control
People have limited self-control e.g., consolidating learning, reading more over summer
Thinking fast and thinking slow
Thinking fast - intuitive and instinctive (decisions are made quickly and little effort required)
Thinking slow - reflective thinking (requires mental effort and concentration)
Availability bias
Making decisions based mainly on probability-recalling similar experiences, events
Anchoring bias
Predictable bias involved in making decisions based on a limited set of items 'anchoring effect'
Altruism
Having concerns for the welfare of others
Fairness
The quality of being impartial, just, or free of favouritism
When making day-to-day decisions, consumers rarely behave in a well-informed and rational way
Behavioural economics
Mixes insights from Psychology with Economics and looks at problems through the eye of a "Human", rather than an "Economic Man"
Economic Man
Infinitely rational and immensely intelligent, an emotionless being who can do cost-benefit analyses at will and is never (ever) wrong
Bounded rationality
Most consumers do not have sufficient information to make fully informed judgements when making their decisions
Satisficing
Consumers opt to satisfice rather than maximise
Heuristics
Mental shortcuts or rules of thumb for decision-making to help people make a quick, satisfactory, but perhaps not perfect, answer to a complex question
Heuristics can lead to systematic deviations from logic, probability, or rational choice theory, resulting in cognitive biases
Default bias
People prefer to carry on behaving as they have always done
Choice architecture
How the decisions we make are affected by the layout/sequencing/range of choices that are available
Social norms
Our day-to-day behaviour is influenced strongly by what we understand to be the prevailing social norms or social customs
Herd behaviour
We are herd animals, and we often make decisions based in part on who is around us and the choices they make
Anchoring
Value is often set by anchors or imprints in our minds which we use as mental reference points
Priming
Our behaviour by cues that work subconsciously and prime us to behave/ choose in certain ways
Framing
Framing a question or offering in a different way often generates a new response by changing the comparison set it is viewed in
Availability bias
The availability bias happens we people often judge the likelihood of an event or frequency of its occurrence by the ease with which examples and instances come to mind
Commitment
The more public our position, the less willing we are to change it
Examples of behavioural economics
Organ donation and importance of form design
Cash incentives to stop smoking
"chunking" to increase drug treatment completion
Lotteries to encourage weight loss or cut speeding on roads
Using simple checklists in hospitals to reduce number of x-rays
Choice architecture to encourage healthy eating
Behavioural nudges
Elimination or restricting choices
Financial disincentives to take a particular course of action
Influencing choice
Behavioural economics may encourage governments to become too paternalistic in their policies attempting to nudge behaviour
Behavioural economics focuses too heavily on people's vulnerability to fall for fallacies and their psychological biases- it can give the impressions than consumers are dumb
Consumers using well-practiced rules of thumb might be operating in a rational way
There are limits to nudge theory- it may be useful in changing minor behaviours but not in deep rooted psychological problems such as alcoholism and street violence
Minsky's 'financial instability hypothesis'
Three distinct stages
Hedge
After crisis- banks are cautious and offer modest borrowing (being able to pay loan and interest)
Speculative
Confidence grows and borrowers only pay interest and loan against an asset. Stage one a distant memory
Ponzi finance
Loan to firms/household- cannot pay loan or interest in the belief that the asset prices will rise. At this point stage two is a distant memory
Rising asset prices
When they eventually fall then borrowers/banks realise there is debt in the system that can never be paid off. People risk paying for assets causing an even larger fall in prices