An attitude is a mentalposition with regard to a fact or state
Thurstone defines attitude as affectfor or against a psychological object
triandis defined attitude as ideascharged with affect, predisposing action
attitude is a summary evaluation of an object of thought
factors in attitude strength
confidence
extremity
coherence
importance
immutability
accessibility
Facets in political attitudes :
Importance, which influences voting behavior and attempts to persuade
Certainty, which influences attempts to persuade and openness
meta-attitudinal attitude strength: our subjective impressions of how strong our attitudes are
meta-attitudinal strength is measured through questionnaires and interviews
operative attitude strength: the objective impact of our attitudes on our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors
operative attitude strength is measured by performance on experimental tasks
holbrook and krosnick found that operative strength and meta attitudinal strength are...
notcorrelated
independentpredictors of resistance to persuasion
but evidence suggests that operative measures are more predictive
explicit attitudes: readily susceptible to cognitive reflection and deliberation
implicit attitudes: evaluative mental associations that operate in largely automatic ways
implicit attitudes can occur
spontaneously (no intention)
efficiently (no resources)
ballistically (hard to control)
unconsciously (without awareness)
explicit attitudes are meta attitudinal, and accessed via self report
implicit attitudes are operative and accessed via experimental performance
we do not know the degree to which implicit and explicit attitudes toward the same attitude object is correlated
implicit attitudes are evaluativementalassociations that may operate in largelyautomatic ways
"Which presidential candidate does Jose prefer?"
Asks how an attitude holder's attitude changes between comparable attitude objects
emphasis on the attitude object as the causal driver of the attitude
"Who likes President Biden more, older voters or younger voters?"
asks how attitudes toward oneattitudeobject compare across multipleattitudeholders
attitudes always reflect qualities of both the attitudeobject and the attitude holder
Most people tend to assume their attitudes are objective and based on the attitude object's actualcharacteristics
Social psychologists view attitudes as subjective -- based on the attitude holder (subject) and shaped by their characteristics
general attitudes have broader relevance but weaker relation to specific behaviors
The behavioral implications of specificattitudes are clearer than general attitudes
Attitudes are summary evaluations
Attitudes vary in strength and explicitness
Attitudes vary in score and impact
Syllogistic reasoning: A form of reasoning that involves the use of logical propositions.
Zero order beliefs: unconscious beliefs that are assumed to be true. e.g., objectpermanence
Horizontalstructure: related attitudes, but if one changes than the others willnot change. e.g., democrats are good b/c universal healthcare and democrats are good b/c gun control is good
Vertical structure: related attitudes, but if one changes the others could change. e.g., Democrats are good because gun control is good, but if your mind about gun control changes your mind about democrats couldchange.
Fishbein's Model:
Belief strength (bi) - beliefs about the characteristics of attitude objects can vary in how firm/certain they are
Evaluative strength (ei) - evaluations of those characteristics can vary from very negative to very positive
summary evaluation - overall attitude reflects combination of these beliefs through a rational process
Example of Fishbein's model:
"Birth control promotes promiscuity":
bi = -1 --> respondent believes birth control doesNOT promote promiscuity
ei = -1 --> respondent evaluates promoting promiscuity as bad
biei = 1 --> the respondent's opinion improves, because they have evaluated a characteristic as bad, but believe the attitude object doesNOT promote that characteristic
through our interactions with social systems, we unwittingly absorb cultural ideas and values
cultural conditioning can implicitly ground attitudes without conscious reflection
5 steps of cultural conditioning:
observation: observing others in your culture
imitation: everyone, esp kids, imitates what they see
reinforcement: acting in ways that uphold cultural values for reinforcement
direct: people admiring/liking you for it
vicarious: seeing others get rewarded or rejected
internalization: genuinely believing in the cultural system
manifestation: manifestingbehavior that upholds the cultural system
including systemrecreation: becoming a role model within the system
Evaluative conditioning: when an attitude object becomes associated with something you already like or dislike
Evaluative conditioning is a transfer of attitude by mere association, not logic or reasoning
experiencing a conditioned and unconditioned stimulus together --> transfer of evaluative response from unconditioned stimulus to conditioned stimulus