Gene and genotypic frequencies at the population level
Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
Factors that keep gene and genotypic frequencies constant over many generations
Factors that tend to change gene frequencies in the population
Random mating is assumed occurring in a large population
Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
When gene and genotypic frequencies are kept constant from generation to generation
Assumptions for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
Infinite or large population
Random mating
No forces changing gene frequency (selection, migration and mutation)
Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium/Law
An equilibrium state of a single locus in a randomly mating diploid population that is free of other evolutionary forces: mutation, migration, selection and genetic drift
Genetic drift
Causes random changes in the allele frequency
Alleles are lost from the population
Direction of random drift is neutral
Small populations
Subject to random drift: a higher likelihood that gene frequencies fluctuate from one generation to another just by chance
Less likelihood of random mating to occur
Large populations
Random drift is not an issue
A higher possibility of random mating occurring
Founder effect
When the population grew from a few founding individuals
A few individuals cannot represent all the genomes of a founding population
Random genetic drift
Changes gene and genotype frequencies in small isolated populations
Random mating
Individuals have equal chance to mate among them
Required to maintain a constant state of unchanged gene and genotypic frequencies in an infinitely large population
Individuals contribute proportionately to the generation of offspring in the next generation
Seldom occurring in livestock populations
Non-random mating in livestock populations
Animals are assigned mates in mating systems
Use of reproductive biotechnologies such as artificial insemination and multiple ovulation and embryo transfer techniques would dictate which animals are selected as parents
A small number of males are selected as parents to be mated to a larger number of females in the population
Possible parent mating combinations in random mating
AA x AA
Aa x AA
aa x AA
AA x Aa
Aa x Aa
aa x Aa
AA x aa
Aa x aa
aa x aa
Genotypic frequency in random mating
25% AA: 50% Aa: 25% aa
Possible parent mating combinations and expected offspring genotypes in random mating
AA x AA: 4 AA
AA x Aa: 2 AA, 2 Aa
AA x aa: 4 Aa
Aa x AA: 2 AA, 2 Aa
Aa x Aa: 1 AA, 2 Aa, 1 aa
Aa x aa: 2 Aa, 2 aa
aa x AA: 4 Aa
aa x Aa: 2 Aa, 2 aa
aa x aa: 4 aa
Positive assortative mating
Mating between individuals of similar phenotypes for selected traits
Increases the number of homozygotes and decreases the number of heterozygotes
Possible parent mating combinations in positive assortative mating
AA x AA
Aa x Aa
aa x aa
Expected offspring genotypes in positive assortative mating
AA x AA: 4 AA
Aa x Aa: 1 AA, 2 Aa, 1 aa
aa x aa: 4 aa
Consanguineous mating
Mating of closely related individuals
Results in a high inbreeding coefficient and less genetic diversity among descendants
Can increase frequency of deleterious or advantageous alleles if present in the family
Negative assortative mating
Mating between individuals of dissimilar phenotypes for selected traits
Increases the number of heterozygotes and decreases the number of homozygotes
Possible parent mating combinations in negative assortative mating
AA x Aa, Aa x AA, aa x AA
AA x aa, Aa x aa, aa x Aa
Equilibrium distribution of genotypes not possible with non-random mating
Non-random mating used in genetic improvement programmes of livestock to increase the frequency of desirable alleles
Non-random mating used in developing purebred lines of laboratory animals, dogs, horses and farm animals
Non-random mating in small isolated populations may increase frequency of genetically inherited abnormalities and diseases
Non-random mating normally happening in small populations such as commercial livestock herds/flocks
Genetic drift
Random changes in allele frequencies due to small populations
Dispersive force removing genetic variation from the population
Probability of survival of new mutations is quite independent of population size
Neutral theory
Most allelic substitutions are neutral
Most mutations have no influence on survival of genotypes
Mutations that do affect survival are subjected to natural selection
Natural populations are dynamic and always fluctuate in size