If we are off on how we understand human freedom, our moral compass is inaccurate from the very start
True freedom
The ability to choose the best possible good
Acting freely (autonomously)
Acting morally are one and the same thing
An individual's action is free
His own reason generated the maxim (principle)
Individual motivated by bodily desire (ex. Hunger or desire)
His actions are not free and he would not be morally praiseworthy, even if he did the right thing
Going to church in order to get the promised one sack of rice and groceries given during Sunday service
Obeying the teacher to get high grades
Only the motive of duty, acting according to the law I give myself
Confers moral worth to an action
I am only free
When my will is determined autonomously, governed by the law I give myself
Categorical Imperative
Commands that you must follow, regardless of your desires
Hypothetical Imperative
Commands based on reason
Categorical Imperative
Not conditional; it is concerned not with the matter of the action and its presumed results, but with its form, and with the principle from which it follows
Universalizability Principle
Acting in accordance with what REASON dictates; at the same time, will that it can become a universal law (something that must always be done in similar situations)
Moral Actions should not bring about contradiction
Formula of Humanity
Act so that you treat humanity, whether in your own person, or in that of another, always as an end and never as a MERE MEANS
Mere means
Using it only for your own benefit, with no thought to the interest or benefit of the thing you're using
Proper rational application of the categorical imperative would lead us to moral truth that is fixed and applicable to all moral agents
Freedom
Human's greatest quality and it is a reflection of our creator
Rooted in reason and will, to act or not to act, to do this or that and so to perform deliberate actions on one's own responsibility
Whenever man deliberately chooses, he is the "father of his acts"
These freely chosen acts can be morally evaluated as good or evil
A good intention can never turn an evil act into a good one
A good purpose cannot justify evil means
An evil intention can make a good act into an evil one, such as giving alms to gain praise
Only the act and the intention make an act good or bad
The circumstances can increase or diminish the goodness or evil
Stealing a large amount of money increases the evil, while fear of harm can lessen a person's responsibility
Circumstances can never make an evil act into a good one
An act is good when the object, the intention, and the circumstances are all good
Some acts are evil in themselves as fornication and are always wrong to choose
The person's intention and the circumstances, such as pressure (duress), cannot change a morally evil act, such as murder, blasphemy, or adultery, into a morally good act