Internal factors refer to factors effecting education in the school, classroom or education
Hargeaves et Al - Labelling
When applied to social class, labelling is;
Speculation: based on clothes/accent
Elaboration: evidence, such as supplies
Stabilisation: knowing based on parents evening and grades
Becker - Ideal pupil
When applied to social class, the ideal pupil is upper class, dresses nice, speaks posh and well-educated
Rist - Study of Labelling
Found that info about home life and appearance was used to put children into sets:
Tigers - middle class
Cardinals/clowns - working class and less interactsd with and sat further away
Dunne & Gazeley - Labelling
Found that working class parents are uninterested and normalise underacheivement,
while middle class parents are supportive and will receive help if underacheiving
Self-fulfilingprophecy
When applied to social class, the working class student will do as bad as the teacher expects
Rosenthal & Jacobson - Self-fulfilingprophecy
Teachers will expect middle class students to be smarter because parents are more engaged
Streaming
Separating pupils in different groups/classes
A benefit of streaming is...
they can work with likeminded people
A con of streaming is...
it replicates class inequality
Sel-fulfiling prophecy is more prone to occur if pupils are streamed
Gillborn & Youdel - Educational triage
Were students are split into 3 distinct groups
Gillborn & Youdel - Educational triage
The groups they are split into;
Safe (high A-C*)
Under-achievers (will succeed with support)
Hopeless cases (going to underachieve)
Becker - Ideal pupil
Usually, teachers do not view working class pupils as ideal
Douglas - Study about streaming
Found children who were placed in lower streams at 8, declined in IQ by 11
Pupil subcultures refers to a group whose values/behaviours differ from the dominant culture they are from (mainstream)
Lacey - <STUDY> Development of Pupil Subcultures
Was researched in a boys grammar school, using both participant/non-participant observations, such as teaching some lessons, observing others, helping in a cricket team and school trips
Lacey - Development of Pupil Subcultures
Identified two steps;
Differentiation: streaming of pupils, giving the more likely to achieve a better status
Polarisation: way in which pupils respond to streaming, either pro or anti subculture
Lacey - Development of Pupil Subcultures
Pro-School subculture: high ability group of middle class student who are approved of by teachers so gain status via academic success
Lacey - Development of Pupil Subcultures
Anti-School Subculture: low ability group of working class students who look for other ways to gain status because they were already labelled as a failure
Becker - Ideal pupil
Those from pro-school subcultures are more likely to adhere to the concept of "ideal pupil"
Hargreaves - Streaming/Subcultures
Boys in lower streams were triple failures (failed 11+ exams), they were labelled as "worthless louts"
Hargreaves - Streaming/Subcultures
Pupils in anti-school subcultures had experienced status frustration, which is unhappiness caused by an inability yo go where they want
Willis - Learning to Labour
The long term effect of the lads in the study is they joined low-skilled jobs
Ball - <STUDY> Abolishing Streaming
Did research at a comprehensive school in the process of abolishing streaming in favour for teaching mixed ability groups
Ball - Abolishing Streaming
Found that teachers still categorised pupils, it meant class inequalities still occurred because pupils with a positive label received improved exam results
Woods - Pupil responses to Streaming
Identified 4 responses:
Ingratiation
Ritualism
Retreatism
Rebellion
Woods - Ingratiation is...
being teachers 'pet'
Woods - Ritualism is...
going through the motions and staying out of trouble
Woods - Retreatism is...
day dreaming and messing about
Woods - Rebellion is...
rejecting everything, i.e. work
Furlong - Variety of pupil Responses
He concludes that pupils can go between all 4 responses to streaming
<EVALUATION> - Labelling
-Deterministic and forgets self-negating prophecy
-Marxists argue this ignores wider social structures that reproduce class inequality
-Fuller, people can reject negative labelling
Archer et Al - Working class identities and school
Working class pupils can often have identities that are not made for success in education
Archer et Al - Habitus
This is the way pupils think and behave via social class, working class pupils often have a different fashion and outlook on life
Archer et Al - Symbolic Capital and violence
This is the clash of the working class habitus of the pupil and the schools middle class habitus, working class students often lack symbolic capital (the tastes that are worth more and value in schools)
Archer et Al - 'Nike' Identities
Working class pupils dress in fashion to gain respect of the brand, they prioritise the clothing over the want to go to further education
Archer et Al/Ingram - Working class identities and success
When grammar schools or local secondary schools have different habitus, working class boys who go to them can't separate themselves from their working class habitus in either
Archer et Al/Evans - Class identities and self-exclusion
Working class pupils who go university find their habitus clashing, this leads to self-exclusion (i.e. Evans says working class pupils don't apply to Oxbridge because they wont 'fit in')