states the direction of the experiment (eg. higher, lower, slower, faster)
Non-directional hypothesis
states a difference, but nodirection
operationalisation
clearly defining variables and making them specific
extraneous variables
any variable that you are not investigating that could potentially affect the outcomes of the study
confounding variables
variables that counfound the indepedant and dependant variable
demand characteristics
participants acting in a way that they think is expected (overperforming to please the experiment, or underperforming to sabotage the results)
investigator effects
where the behaviour of the researcher effects participating behaviour (smiling at certain responses, leading questions)
social desirability bias
participants acting in a way that makes themselves look better to others
experimental design
the way in which participants are arranged in an experiment
independant groups
participants separated into different groups, does 1 condition each
repeated measures
all participants take part in all conditions
counterbalacing
half the participants experience the condition in one order and the otherhalf in the opposite order
matched pairs
similiar participants (eg age, gender, IQ) are paired and split into different conditions
experimental methods
the way the experiment is carried out
lab experiments
conducted in highly controlled environments, researcher changes IV, high control over extraneous variables
field experiment
IV is manipulated by researcher in a natural every day setting (participants usual environment)
natural experiment
researcher has no control over IV and cannot change it (someone/someone else controls it)
quasi experiment
the IV is based on existing differences that cannot be controlled (age/gender)
random sampling
obtain everyone in population, lottery method, take names out of hat
systematic sampling
the nth person, list everyone in alphabetical order, sampling system nominated (eg, every 5th person)
stratified sampling
reflects proportions of certain people in society. identify subgroups that make up population (eg. gender, age), proportions worked out, participants in each subgroup randomly chosen
opportunity sampling
selects anyone who is available and convenient
volunteer sampling
participants select themselves to be in the sample
pilot study
small-scale run study, (trying out questions, identifying any potential issues, modifying design/procedure)
single-blind procedure
participants unaware of aims of study, will be revealed at end of study, to control demand characterstics
double-blind procedure
neither participants or researcher told aim of study, usually third party conducts experiment
naturalistic observations
watching behaviour in a setting it usually occurs in
controlled observations
watching behaviour within a structured setting
covert observation
participants being observed without them knowing
overt observation
participants know their behaviour is being observed
participant observations
researcher becomes a member of the group
non-participant observations
researcher remains outside the group
self report techniques
ways of gaining info.
questionnaires
a pre-list set of questions to ask participants
open questions
do not have fixed set of answers, gains a variety of answers, takes time to sort through, more rich qualitative data,
closed questions
have a fixed number of answers (eg. yes or no answers/scale of 1-10 answers) produces quantative answers, easier to produce conclusions, less rich data
structured interviews
pre-determined set of questions asked in a fixed order, easier to compare data, less rich data
unstructured interviews
certain topic discussed, participants can elaborate on answers, gives richer detail, requires trained interviewer