Discuss how various media drives affect global Integration
Enumerate the advantages of local and global media in creating a global village
Appreciate the dynamics between local and global cultural production by creating a slogan or info graphics
The infographic reveals:
Cultural Imperialism
The theory that audiences across the globe are heavily affected by media messages emanating from the Western industrialized countries
Media Imperialism
A category of cultural imperialism
Cultural Imperialism
Grounded in an understanding of media as cultural industries
Firmly rooted in a political-economy perspective on international communication
In the early stage of cultural imperialism, researchers focused their efforts mostly on nation-states as primary actors in international relations
The flow of news and entertainment was biased in favor of industrialized countries
The inequality existed in news and entertainment programs alike, and to the advent of then-new media technologies such as communication satellites
The global media debate was launched during the 1973 General Conference of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
Positions in the global media debate
Western industrialized nations insisted on the "free flow of information" doctrine, advocating "free trade" in information and media programs without any restrictions
Developing countries accused Western countries of invoking the free flow of information ideology to justify their economic and cultural domination, and argued instead for a "free and balanced flow" of information
The chasm between the two groups was too wide to be reconciled, which was one of the major reasons given for withdrawal from UNESCO by the United States and the United Kingdom
Second stage of cultural imperialism research
Emphasis on the commercialization of the sphere of culture, with a focus on transnational corporations as actors and on transnational capital flows
It is hard to separate the power of transnational corporations from that of nation-states, and it is difficult to distinguish clearly between capital flows and media flows
The concept of globalization has in some ways replaced cultural imperialism as the main conceptual umbrella under which much research and theorizing in international communication have been conducted
Reasons for the analytical shift from cultural imperialism to globalization
The end of the Cold War, making the world more fragmented and the nation-state no longer the sole or dominant player
Globalization conveys a process with less coherence and direction, which will weaken the cultural unity of all nation-states, not only those in the developing world
Globalization has emerged as a key perspective across the humanities and social sciences
Homogenization of cultural differences across the planet
A perspective on the globalization of culture, somewhat reminiscent of cultural imperialism
Benjamin Barber's theory on the globalization of culture
Based on a binary opposition between Jihad (ethnic and religious tribalism) and McWorld (the capital-driven West)
Privileges the global over the local, arguing that globalization rules via transnational capitalism
Cultural hybridity or hybridization
Privileges an understanding of the interface of globalization and localization as a dynamic process and hybrid product of mixed traditions and cultural forms
Emphasizes processes of mediation as central to cultural globalization
Features of cultural hybridity
Mixing previously separate cultural systems
Deterritorialization of cultural processes from their original physical environment to new and foreign contexts
Formation of impure cultural genres out of the mixture of several cultural domains
There is no obvious or final answer to the question of whether transnational media have made cultures across the globe hybrid or if cultures have always been to some extent hybrid
Cultures have been in contact for a long time through warfare, trade, migration, and slavery, so a degree of hybridization in all cultures can be assumed
Global media and information technologies have substantially increased contacts between cultures, both in terms of intensity and speed, so they intensify the hybridity that is already in existence in cultures across the globe
The globalization of culture through the media is not a process of complete homogenization, but rather one where cohesion and fragmentation coexist