"We have no other recourse left but to fight for our rights with arms in hand." - Rizal
History reading
Ways that historians interpret the world
Categories of historical study
Political
Ideological
Social
Economic
Artistic
Historians study
Basic systems (feudalism, monarchy, etc.)
Types of texts historians read
Memoir
Biography
Historical fiction
Political map
Thematic
Data Tables
Textbook
Juried Essay
Polemic Essay
Editorial
News story
Political Cartoon
Graphic Novel
Graph, chart, table
Artwork
Interview
Documentary
Video
Trade books
Legislation
Legal Documents
Photographs
Historical artifacts
Translations
Blogs, tweets
Primary Sources
Artifacts, documents, recordings, etc. from time period
Secondary Sources
Interpretations of primary sources
Tertiary Sources
Interpretations of secondary sources
Contingency
Chance; Coincidence
Out of the conversations grew Bunau-Varilla's conviction that if the Panamanians tried to declare their independence, the United State would use force.
Because people had difficulty finding work during the depression, Roosevelt created a number of works programs.
The balance is certainly struck in the history of decisive battles: Those most contingent of events whose effects alter the parameters of possibility. In this context, the 'great men' of history such as William the conqueror do not control and predict the uncontrollable and unpredictable. Rather they are those best able to take advantage of the chances thrown their way and make things happen.
History is an interpretation
There are competing narratives
History is an approximation of the past
History is contested and contestable
To understand history, one must have historical empathy
Historians care about historical significance
Some events and issues are more significant that others
Sourcing
Determining where information came from
Contextualization
Determining what the circumstances were when the information was written
Corroboration
Determining the extent of agreement and disagreement across sources
Historians question how inclusive the interpretation is—what perspectives are included and what is left out
Historians question the coherence of the historical arguments—whether or not they make sense
Historians look at word choice as a signal of an author's perspective
Historians try to find out where a story begins and ends (periodization)
Historians read history as an argument—a presentation of warrants, claims, and evidence, even if the text has a narrative structure
Textbooks commonly combine narrative, exposition, and description
Texts use conventions of chronology (before, after, next, In [date], later)
Texts borrow technical vocabulary from the other social sciences (economics, political science, sociology, etc.)
Texts have a lot of difficult general academic vocabulary
Texts employ metaphorical language (e.g. The gilded age)
Primary sources often use outdated language and ideas that are difficult and sometimes uncomfortable to read
Sentences are complex—the information can be buried in long noun phrases
Sentences are about time, place, and manner (over the next decade; they gathered in Philadelphia, their harsh stands made enemies)
There are participants/actors, processes, and goals
By 1932 the unemployment rate had soared past 20 percent. Thousands of banks and businesses had failed. Millions were homeless. Men (and women) returned home from fruitless job hunts to find their dwellings padlocked and their possessions and families turned into the street. Many drifted from town to town looking for non-existent jobs. Many more lived at the edges of cities in makeshift shantytowns their residents derisively called Hoovervilles. People foraged in dumps and garbage cans for food.
The presidential campaign of 1932 was run against the backdrop of the Depression. Franklin Delano Roosevelt won the Democratic nomination and campaigned on a platform of attention to "the forgotten man at the bottom of the economic pyramid." Hoover continued to insist it was not the government's job to address the growing social crisis. Roosevelt won in a landslide. He took office on March 4, 1933, with the declaration that "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself."
Historians must be aware of the climate of opinion or shared set of values, assumptions, ideas, and emotions that influence the way their sources are constructed and the way they perceive those sources.
An individual's own frame of reference-- the product of one's own individual experiences lived--must be acknowledged by the perceptive historian in order to determine the reliability and credibility of a source in relation to others.