Given by HICs to support economic development or social development in LICs. Aims to alleviate poverty in the long term, rather than immediate problems.
Currently 28 active projects, e.g.1) Illegal Wildlife Trade-threatening ecosystems, species and is due to corruption. UK has given grants worth £23 million, as well as committing to 75 projects since 2013.2)Plastic Waste-help to understand where plastic waste is from/going. Helped 3260km of coastal areas (health, fisheries, tourism, shipping).
Currently 7 active projects, e.g.1)Illegal Wildlife Trade-same as Vietnam2)Higher Education Programmes3)Frontiers for Engineering-collaboration with international bodies to help pioneering technical work.
Syria-75% of funding reduced.Pakistan-cuts will impact education, with nearly 11,000 girls not able to attend school if funding stops.Nigeria-UK terminated a 3 year grant that was "halfway through implementation".Bangladesh-health project terminated that would have helped 2.6m people, training of health service providers will no longer happen, currently outbreak of diarrhoea which would of been responded to if project in place, government can't fill gap created by sudden withdrawal of project/funds.
Development Investment Project (FDI)-M-Pesa, Kenya
M-Pesa;-Started in 2002 as phone companies noticed that they had unintentionally invented something that almost resembled a currency, users in Kenya were purchasing and reselling "airtime" (data/minutes).-M-Pesa was developed as a texting based system for storing and selling money.-To make a deposit, it uses human agents, people who hang out in key locations around the country.Impacts of M-Pesa;-By 2012 has 15 million subscribers and 30,000 agents-Now 72% of Kenya have a mobile money account-Provides stability and allows for growth
-Initially M-Pesa meant to be used to repay micro loans.
-However, creators of M-Pesa started seeing other uses, e.g businesses using it as an overnight safe (substitute for financial institutions they didn't have access to).
-Form of mobile money has directly boosted economic well-being in Kenya, and lifted 194,000 households out of poverty.
-Micro credit allowed businesses to grow and develop.
Which is Most Effective:Bottom Up or Top-Down Schemes ?
-Bottom up likely to be more effective as NGOs will actually go into the community and solve the issue,however the funds are very small and it might not actually help a country as a whole.-Top down will likely help a country as a whole as e.g IDA, have large pots of money,however is a risk of LICs being exploited and AID not actually helping.-Urban/rural will be affected differently-Needs a stable government
Should AID be Looked at Alongside Longer Term Measures (Debt Relief)
-Debt relief should 100% be implemented alongside AID, as brings out huge benefits and reduces the economic stress in a nation=economic development.
-Changing terms of trade is more of a long term solution and won't happen instantly, however depends if HICs will change their trade patterns to accommodate for LICs
-A lot of the AID is what they actually need, e.g French NGO built cultural projects when needed a road, $124 million spent on industrial park but instead of creating jobs it took away productive farmland.
UK based NGO provides 3 goats on credit to poor households headed by women.Positives-families have greater access to milk, meat and manure, women given talks about goats which can be passed on, potential health benefits and income which can be used for schooling etc.Negatives-only project in vast area, takes 2-5 years for families to see benefits.
£179 million wind farm with 84 turbines. Located 475 miles north of the capital, supplying 3 million with electricity.Positives-400 million Kwh energy produced, room for expansion/growth, jobs created from construction phase.Negatives-700 families lost their land as a result, electricity sold to neighbouring countries so not all benefitting.