States that no act is deviant or criminal itself. It only becomes so when we create rules and apply them to others .
Differential enforcement of the law
Interactionists argue that social control agencies such as the police label certain groups as criminal. This results in differential enforcement - where the law is enforced more against one group than against another
Piliavin and Briar
Found police decisions to arrest were based on stereotypical ideas about a persons manner, dress, gender, class and ethnicity, and the time and place.
Cicourel
found that police use typifications of the ‘typical delinquent‘
Lemert
argues labelling is the cause of crime and deviance. By labelling certain people as deviant, society encourages them to become more so.
primary deviance - involves acts that have been publicly labelled and those who commit these acts do not see them selves as criminals
Secondary deviance - results from labelling. people may treat offender solely in terms of their label making it their master status. As a result offender may be rejected by society and forced into the company of other criminals
The deviance amplification spiral
This is where the attempt to control deviance through a ‘crackdown’ leads to it increasing rather than decreasing. This prompts even greater attempts to control it and, in turn, yet more deviance, in an escalating spiral
Interactionism and crime statistics
reject the use of the crime statistics compelled by the police. They argue that the statistics measure what the police do rather than what criminals do